Showing posts with label canon digital camera top rated. Show all posts
Showing posts with label canon digital camera top rated. Show all posts

Yongnuo Speedlite YN560 Flash for Canon, Nikon Cameras

Yongnuo Speedlite YN560 Flash for Canon, Nikon Cameras
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
List Price: $99.99
Sale Price: $59.99
Today's Bonus: 40% Off
Buy Now

I haven't shot enough with it to determine consistency, but I'm pleased so far. Flash is a bit large for the output, but it is still decent. I did some test shots and was getting f8 at 18 ft. This tells me that the GN is just about 144. The specs put it at just 58. (Maybe that was supposed to be meters and not feet). This is almost as good as I got from the Sunpak PZ42XC at full on manual.

Build is similar to the Sunpak flashes. Swivel and bounce feel no less solid and click into place just fine without shifting. The built in diffuser AND mini bounce card are nice although small. My sunpak PZ42XC doesn't have that. There is a PC sync and a power supply connection on the side which my sunpak doesn't have either. Then there is the optical slave which works well with two levels of sensitivity and of course my sunpak lacks that as well.

With all of that said, this flash isn't for just anybody. This is just a plain dumb manual flash without TTL or even a thyristor. THERE IS NO AUTO FUNCTION. If your intent is to use this as a camera mounted flash for candids, forget it unless you know how to manually setup for every shot by adjusting your aperture as needed. It is not intended for that purpose.

The flash came with a base that has a threaded hole in the bottom so it can be mounted to a stand. It would do a terrific job providing fill or backlight capability. It swivels 180 degrees and straight up so bouncing into an umbrella or through a diffuser while the slave sensor faces forward for a stationary photo shoot are ideal uses of this flash. So is placing it behind a subject for a backlight. My Lumiquest gel holder fits very tight due to the large flash head, but it fits.

The controls and lights on the back seem a bit confusing and the manual isn't a lot of help since the translation from Chinese to English is about the same quality as you get from Google translate..... I was able to figure it out but it took some time experimenting with the unit.

Recharge is quick even at full power. I was very impressed. Of course it has less output than the Sunpak and uses the same number of batteries but still, I was pleased.

One other note. When i first tried to turn it on it wouldn't do anything and I was immediately afraid it was DOA. I found that to turn it on, you must hold the on-off button for a couple seconds. When you press it down, the lights on the bar progress from left to right and if you don't hold it down till the lights get to the far right, it just shuts off. Awkward, but easy to deal with if you are aware of it.

Altogether, I'm quite pleased with what I have assuming it lasts a a while. The build seems solid so I'll just have to wait and see. I'm confident enough in the product that I'm going to buy a second one so I can have one for fill and the other for a backlight for impromptu studio shots.

If you need a slave flash with some power and manual controls I really think this is the best thing out there. Almost everything else in this price range is a single power or auto-flash without the ability to make manual output adjustments. You can get this output with no slave, the slave with no manual,or you can spend twice as much. But if you need a speedlight with auto functions for camera mounted shots, get something with auto functions.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Olympus SZ-31MR 16MP CMOS Camera with 24x Wide-Angle Zoom

Olympus SZ-31MR 16MP CMOS Camera with 24x Wide-Angle Zoom and 3-inch 920k Hi-Res LCD Touch Panel
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
List Price: $399.99
Sale Price: $399.00
Today's Bonus: $0.99 Off
Buy Now

I have had several Olympus cameras and had good luck with all of them. Received the SZ-31MR just before a trip to Victoria, BC in September. Beautiful weather and the city was still green with lots of flowers. This trip was really a great opportunity to test the versatility of the camera, macro for the flowers, various wide angle and telephoto for harbor scenes, legislative house by day and night, scenery pictures from a drive in the mountains, etc. etc. September is a beautiful time of the year to visit Victoria by the way. I tried out the "hand-held starlight" with impressive results. Obviously the results are better if the camera is supported, but did get some great night shots of lit buildings, street markets, etc. Impressed with the versatility of the camera, optical zoom is very impressive for something this small and light, even digital zoom is good in day light. For a fit in your pocket, light weight, pretty much do it all camera, I can't think of a better one. I have also used the "pet mode" to get some great pictures of our dogs!

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Sony Bloggie Touch Camera, 4-Hour (Black)

Sony Bloggie Touch Camera, 4-Hour
Customer Ratings: 3.5 stars
Buy Now
I've had this camera for about a week now and have been loving it ever since. I've used another "flip" camcorder and the Bloggie Touch puts it to shame.

Pros:

1. Love the quick on and record. Great for spontaneous videos of the little one.

2. The touch screen interface makes it both useful and fun to use the big screen.

3. The still pictures come out brilliant, when the lighting and focus is good.

4. The battery charges up super fast and stays with you for a whole day of shooting.

5. The image stabilization is good. You can take decent video while walking around and panning too. Note that it is not optical, but electronic SteadyShot stabilization.

6. The lens is very good quality and the pictures are crisp.

7. Really like the "snap picture while recording" feature. I find myself using that feature the most. The video doesn't stall while the picture (full 12M resolution) is being taken and since the focus and exposure are usually locked well while you're in the middle of the video, the pictures come out great.

Cons:

1. In low lighting, there is quite a bit of graininess and using the digital zoom makes it much worse.

2. While the lens is good quality, the auto-focus mechanism is really very slow. If you move around the camera too much before focus has locked on, the auto-focus will almost never lock.

3. What I really miss with this camera is a flash. Even a tiny one would help with low light pictures.

4. Minor annoyance: to preview a picture right after you take it, you have to go through at least two clicks. Sony could have designed it so that it always goes to the last picture taken by default, instead of the thumbnail list of all pictures/video on the device.

I decided to purchase this camera over a still camera that can do video because:

1. This one is dead simple. One button to turn on, one to take video and one to take stills. This makes it both easy and quick to use.

2. This one can do 1080p video and 720p at 60fps.

3. Its under $200 and is smaller than your phone.

4. Its got internal flash and USB connector no more SD cards or cables. 8GB is enough to get you through the day before you can come back to your laptop to dump the pictures.

I decided to purchase this camera over other ones in the same category because:

1. Its got a big display and the touch screen is fun to use.

2. Its got a better lens system than the others.

3. Its got (some) image stabilization.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Motorola XT-910 DROID RAZR Unlocked GSM Smartphone with 8 MP

Motorola XT-910 DROID RAZR Unlocked GSM Smartphone with 8 MP Camera, Android OS, Wi-Fi, and GPS--No Warranty
Customer Ratings: 3.5 stars
List Price: $799.99
Sale Price: $262.99
Today's Bonus: 67% Off
Buy Now

I don't understand why Amazon is selling this phone as UNLOCKED when is NOT UNLOCKED, this phone is locked to Yoigo Spain, and unlock codes doesn't work because of some Yoigo problem.

If you live in South America this phone will not work, yo have been warned, and the worst thing is that Amazon won't help you in any way, I wrote them about the problem and they told me to comunicate to Motorola, I did that via Mail and Motorola never responded me, then I told Amazon that Motorola didn't respond me and they also didn't respond, so I was left alone to solve this problem any way I can when it should be Amazon's obligaton to give me a solution. I have been a very good Amazon customer and I am really disapointed that after buying so many things from them, I didn't get any help, a very good customer as I, should't be treated that way!

At first when I inserted my Sim card I got a message asking for a network code, but after trying many codes the message was gone and now I only get an Invalid Sim message, so now my only choice is to unlock it via software, so I have to pay an extra $35 to a store so my phone can be unlock via software, I just hope it works, otherwise I will have a very nice $500 mp3 player.

So to resume don't buy this phone because it is NOT UNLOCKED and Amazon won't give you any help!

At the end , there was no way to unlcok this phone, I tried everything and it wasn't posible!

Also the phone was bought directly from Amazon.com LLC, not from a reseller.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Canon Powershot SD990IS 14.7MP Digital Camera with 3.7x Optical

Canon Powershot SD990IS 14.7MP Digital Camera with 3.7x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom Coach Kit
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
List Price: $999.95
Sale Price: $949.95
Today's Bonus: 5% Off
Buy Now

I realize there IS no "perfect point and shoot camera". I suppose there can not be a PERFECT small camera due to the small size.

In recent months I have owned TOO many small point and shoot cameras including..the older Canon SD950, a Fuji F100FD, a Panasonic TZ5, Even an Olympus 1010 model..and lastly bought a new discontinued Fuji F30 off e-bay for indoor low light shooting. I am sort of running my own private consumer reports situation it seems. :)

This SD 990IS is maybe the best OVERALL point and Shoot I ever had. But, instead of all the usual glowing remarks Canon Elphs seem to get..I want to point out a few negatives or inconsistencies with this camera. I mostly bought this camera because of the new function..FACE SELF TIMER seemed like a GREAT and useful idea as I take more pics with my g/f, or friends, dog, whatever..on timer than anything else. Long story short Face Detection works THE best on this 990 of ANY other camera I have ever used. It's nearly flawless INDOORS. However I tend to use this Canon more OUTDOORS. Problem is is in rather bright sunshine like MANY cameras, Face detection has trouble. Simply, often it doe NOT detect a face..and won't detect the second face either. This is only in rather strong sunshine..otherwise Face detection and Face Self timer DOES work and works rather well. The lens is OK, but on such an expensive elph I feel there should be less purple fringing THOUGH it's not BAD..but it IS there...and also indoors ISO set above 250 or so tends to get a bit grainy. So much so, I set the megapixels to 10..thereby why did I need a 14.7 meg camera??

I have also noted to my eyes this camera is not producing the almost too vivid colors of most canons...DEEP greens...Deep blues. But I actually feel the colors produced by this camera are perhaps more natural than almost any point and shoot I have had so that's a good thing. Also a positive..this camera handles blown highlights (Too BRIGHT) and dark shadows better than most. To sum up..this IS a really good camera with REALLY useful features WHEN they work, ala face detection in bright sun.

I feel Canon and just about all the point and shoot cams presently out there are WAY too concerned about who's got the most meagapixels. I'd much MUCH prefer a camera closer to my OLDER Fuji F30 which BLOWS the doors of this Canon in low light no flash) WITH JUST 6 MEGAPIXELS..then a nearly 15 meagpixel camera with too much noise. The Fuji's lens sadly has THE most purple fringing outdoors of any cam I have tried, hence my search has continued. To sum up..in today's market..perhaps this 990is may be about the best OVERALL small cam out there..but as I pointed out..if you are rather picky..it has a few flaws and I feel it is a bit overpriced...BUT also a VERY good camera which will make most people quite happy. It has a nice metal body..and the battery lasts a LONG time..another plus!

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Energizer Ultimate Lithium Batteries

Energizer AA Lithium Batteries 4 count, Lasts 9 Times Longer
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
List Price: $13.95
Sale Price: $5.27
Today's Bonus: 62% Off
Buy Now

The Energizer L91 Lithium AA cell is a fantastic power source. For high-drain applications, it offers great advantages over ordinary alkaline cell and rechargeable NiMH cell. However, it is also very expensive as a disposable battery. So it is important to recognize the strength of L91, and use it only in applications that give you the best results. Otherwise you'll be wasting your money.

According to data sheet published by Energizer, the capacity of the Lithium AA cell (L91) is 3000mAh. This number remains nearly constant with load current. In comparison, the ordinary Alkaline battery (such as the Energizer E91 AA) is rated as 2800mAh, but only at a very light load of 25mA. At a heavy load of 1000mA (typical for a digital camera or flash unit), its capacity drops to below 1000mAh. This number gets even worse at low temperature. At zero degree C and 1000mA load, the L91 can provide about seven times more energy compared to the E91. This is where the marketing claim of "Last up to 7 times longer" comes from.

When used in a digital camera at room temperature of 25 degree C, the L91 is more likely to last 3-4 times longer than alkaline. This is enough to justify its price, which is also around 3-4 times higher than alkaline. However, in low-drain applications (such as smoke detector, wireless mouse or remote control) alkaline cells will last just as long at a fraction of the cost.

The L91 also contains much higher energy when compared to an ordinary rechargeable NiMH cell such as the Energizer NH15-2500. This is partially due to its higher terminal voltage of 1.5V, which is 20% higher than that for NiMH.

Energy stored in NH15-2500 : 2.5Ah * 1.25V = 3.125Wh,

Energy stored in L91 : 3Ah * 1.5V = 4.5Wh (44% higher).

Higher terminal voltage for L91 is especially advantageous in digital camera applications, because your camera flash will recharge up to 20% faster. An added benefit is that the L91 weighs only 14.5 grams (0.5 oz) each, compared to 30 grams (1 oz) for NiMH. So your camera becomes much lighter.

The NH15-2500, like all ordinary NiMH cells, suffers from rapid self-discharge problem. If you charge up a set of those cells and leave them in your camera for a few weeks, you're likely to be greeted by 'Low Battery' sign when you try to take a photo. The new generation of 'ready-to-use' NiMH cells such as SANYO eneloop and Rayovac Hybrid solved this problem by having very low self discharge rate. But they have lower capacity of only 2000-2100mAh.

Bottom line: If you need AA batteries for a long hiking trip, then L91 is obviously your best choice. For most other situations, I recommend using low self-discharge NiMH cells for lower operating cost.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Nikon D60 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S

Nikon D60 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S DX VR Nikkor Zoom Lens
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
I've been using Canon PowerShot point-and-shoot digital cameras for the past 6 years, and because they're so small, portable, and unobtrusive, I've ended up taking a lot more photos that I ever did, because I had my camera with me. The good thing is that I've taken a lot more pictures, and most of them have been very good (the camera gets much of the credit here). But the bad thing is that I started to reach the limits of what a point-and-shoot camera can do.

The biggest problems I had with my compact point-and-shoot camera was the lag between shots and the generally poor performance in low-light settings. For most shots, these weren't big problems, but when they were a problem, they were a huge problem, and there's not much you can to solve it without moving to a better camera. I don't think I'm the first person to reach a brick wall when using compact digital cameras, which is why there are now some excellent options that don't cost a fortune.

After reading a lot of reviews for digital SLR cameras online, I narrowed it down to two choices: the Sony A300 or the Nikon D60. I love my compact Canon, but I wasn't all that impressed with the Canon dSLR's that I looked at, either in terms of price or features.

The Sony is priced very competitively and offers some great features, such as auto-focus and image stabilization built into the camera itself, not relying on the lens. The A300 also has live preview on the LCD screen, which the D60 doesn't offer (live preview is what you get on a compact camera: you see what you are shooting as you take the picture). Finally, the A300 has more focus points than the Nikon. I spent a long time in several stores doing side-by-side comparisons of these two cameras. After many test shots, I finally chose the D60 for the following reasons: it felt more compact and less heavy than the Sony, I liked the way the lens felt when I was zooming, its LCD menu system was much clearer and more intuitive, and the Nikkor family of lenses is unbeatable. With a dSLR, it really gets down to which line you want to commit to for future lens purchases. I wasn't sure I wanted to go with Sony, when Nikon is well-known for quality optics.

I ordered the D60 from Amazon and I'm glad I did, since they have a 30-day price match policy. If the price of the camera decreases within 30 days of your purchase, all you have to do is email Amazon, and they'll credit you with the difference. The price of the D60 went down three times after my purchase (it's even lower now, but I've passed my 30 days), and Amazon was fast to process the refund for each decrease. Please note that it's your responsibility to check on the current price. Amazon will not notify you that the price has gone down, and why should they? So if you do buy this from Amazon, be sure to check every couple of days to see what the current price is.

As for the camera and the lens, I couldn't be happier. I love how it feels and how easy it is to use, at least for basic shots. Of course it won't fit in my pocket the way my point-and-shoot did, but it's not nearly as huge or heavy as I'd expected. The kit lens has VR (vibration reduction) which is a good thing to have, and it's well balanced with the compact body of this camera. In other words, the camera doesn't point down under the weight of the lens. Everyone who has tried out my new camera has commented on how compact and ergonomic it feels.

The camera works extremely well in low-light settings, with or without flash (you can defeat the flash if you want, and I find that in many situations, I get better results that way). The flash is a lot more powerful than what you get on a compact camera, and the coverage is more even.

So far, I've mainly used the "auto" mode, but I've taken some pictures in macro mode. It's graat to be able to take pictures in rapid succession, without having to wait the way you do with a point-and-shoot. Most important of all, the image quality is outstanding. The difference is noticeable and consistently better than what I was getting with my point-and-shoot.

The LCD menu is intuitive and visually appealing. That was one of the reasons I went with the Nikon in the first place, and I haven't been disappointed. By pressing the right button as you move the mode dial, you can see a description of what each mode does, which is very helpful. It's sort of like having a "help" system built into the camera, without having to carry around the instructions. Having said that, the instruction manual is really quite good. It won't teach you everything you need to know about digital SLRs, but it does a good job of explaining the camera's features. Nevertheless, I recommend buying a more extensive guide book which is specific to the Nikon D60 (there is one by David Busch which is currently available, and several more are scheduled to appear within the next couple of months).

So, I love this camera, especially at the very reasonable price point. However, there are some things that you should consider before making a final decision. First, the D60 will only provide auto-focus with Nikkor AF-S lenses. That means that most Nikon "prime" lenses will require manual focusing. That wasn't a big deal for me, but it is a limitation. Second, the D60's 3 focus points put it at the low end for this feature. Third, the D60 uses SD cards, while the Sony uses Compact Flash cards, as do many higher-end dSLRS. This isn't really a plus or minus, since SD cards are generally less expensive than Compact Flash, but some users say that Compact Flash cards may be more durable in the long run (they're larger and thicker). Finally, unlike the Sony, the D60 does not provide live preview. In other words, you don't see the image on the LCD until after you have taken it.

With all of that, I'm very pleased with my decision and I am having a lot of fun with my Nikon D60. If you're ready to move up from your point-and-shoot to a dSLR, you cannot go wrong with the D60.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Canon Kiss X5 (EOS 600D / Rebel T3i) with Canon EF-S 18-55mm IS

Canon Kiss X5 with Canon EF-S 18-55mm IS II Lens
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
i have just received this camera today. this camera's picture is really fantastic and fascinating.

Picture quality is really quite good. HD video is really nice. But remember for HD movies recording use large-capacity SD card rated SD speed Class 6 or higher unless movies can't record!!! At first i can record for 5 to 8 sec duration due to poor writing speed of my SD card. So, i was nervous as i added class 4 8GB SD. Finally it was ok. with class 10 SD card :P

I would recommend best buy and best worth DSLR in canon..

Camera setting are extremely simple and easy to understand for entry level shooter.

Just buy it !!!!!!! You won't regret..... around 1000 $ is worth !!

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Sony NEX-5N 16.1 MP Compact Interchangeable Lens Camera

Sony NEX-5N 16.1 MP Compact Interchangeable Lens Camera with Touchscreen - Body Only
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
This camera is great. It is easy to use, takes great pictures, and touch screen is very responsive. The only downfall to the camera is when you have a large lens on it. The camera is really off balance and can be hard to take quality photos. Overall I would not hesitate to buy this camera if you are thinking about it. It has been a great investment.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Nikon 85mm f/1.4D AF Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras

Nikon 85mm f/1.4D AF Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
This lens is highly coveted by anyone that has ever shot with it. The 9-bladed aperture creates beautiful bokeh (the out of focus areas) and the sharpness, color and contrast are amazing. Primarily designed as a portrait lens, it really shines at f/2 to f/5.6 with an amazing 3-D like quality that has to be seen to be believed. The fit and finish are first class, with a nice feel and balance to it. It uses 77mm filters like most other Nikon pro glass and flares quite easily so be sure to use the included metal lens hood.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Panasonic HDC-TM900K 3D Camcorder with 32GB Internal Flash

Panasonic HDC-TM900K 3D Camcorder with 32GB Internal Flash Memory
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
Buy Now
As a TV Broadcast Engineer, I know when things are "right". In any design, there have to be compromises.

All of these small cameras are compromises. I bought the TM-900 for one reason -it's 1000 line resolution

in 1080P. You can't touch that for at least another $2K. What I was surprised about is that Panasonic went

all-out trying to top the competition. Say, compared with a Canon M41 (comparable price range) the Panasonic

has a FAR better viewfinder and LCD screen. The Canon doesn't have any focus ring and the TM's is superb and

versatile. The controls for manual adjustment are light-years better on the Panasonic. The TM has Person

identification, not just face ID. This one is amazingthe TM allows you to use the camera's inside processing

chips while you edit with their editorto hyper-speed the video conversion when making DVD's and Blu-Rays.

That's progressive engineering. The TM also is just beautiful-looking while the Canon is totally low-end (the

camera body itself).

I bought both -why? Because the low-light performance of the TM is only average. It's fine and in most shooting

you'd do well. The Canon M41 has their new HD pro sensor (same at their two best pro-consumer cams)and sees

exactly as well as humans do. It's amazingly good at low-light. the TM also has a top quality of 17MBS in it's

AVHCD regular HD recording. the Canon does 24MBS. The Canon is superior when shooting in 1080i (it's top level).

The TM's best 1080i AVHCD level of 17MBS is very good...excellent.. just not superb. Kick it up a notch to 1080P

and you're speechless. Wow! It's a high-res still photograph-that's moving. But remember, 1080P on the TM is

actually above the HD spec. Uh huh. So, your editor might not handle it. You TV might not handle it. When you

render 1080P from the TM onto a AVHCD DVD to play HD on your BLue-Ray player, it is amazing looking.

Also, you can play the native video files out of a TM-900 and M41 directly out of a good Hard-drive media player.

The editing and storage software with the TM is great. It really is. Smooth operator and burns out DVD's and

AVHCD disks with ease. So, the TM is my go-to camera and the Canon is used only if I'm shooting in natural low-light.

2.5 thumbs up on the Panasonic.. a real Pro-sumer camera at a great price. Bravo Panasonic.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

ASUS Google Nexus 7 Android Tablet

ASUS Google Nexus 7 Android Tablet
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
List Price: $299.00
Sale Price: $190.48
Today's Bonus: 36% Off
Buy Now

Words fail me on how much I love this tablet. I will say I'm slightly Google-biased, as I've owned Android phones before they were cool (and since), I use all their services (including Google+. Yes, there are people on there), and Google sent me a FREE Chromebook to beta-test it a year or two ago. So, yeah, I'm a little biased... =)

BUT, I've waited to buy a tablet. There's 2 iPads (both 3rd gen) in our house, and I do like them, they're worth the $500. However, it's not fun to just play with it. You need apps. Then, apps aren't really fun unless you get the paid version. Then, a $500 tablet becomes $50 dollars more, just to get some basic apps and games! Plus, it's cumbersome and weighty, so if you're playing a game, you'll be sitting it in your lap within 5 minutes.

The Nexus 7 has NONE of those problems.

1. It's $250. (Yes, I paid $275 for the one here, but I'm a Prime member and I have a store card here, so it made sense to buy from Amazon). It is NOT worth that price. It's worth $400 easy, in quality, look, feel, and performance.

2. The wallpapers, widgets, etc. alone can entertain you when you first get it! I customize my screens and change them every week to keep me from getting bored of it, so I gladly welcome how amazing it looks! Jelly Bean is silky smooth and the UI just makes sense, especially compared to Gingerbread, which my phone is stuck with... =(

3. Apps. There is enough on the device to get you started (including a copy of Transformers 3. Not that I'd pay for that *particular* title...), and the Play Store has so many naturally free apps that can do almost ANYTHING! Yes, if you get free apps, there will be some with ads, like with iOS devices, but at least you have a choice with almost every app, the prices for paid apps seem MUCH more reasonable, and Google gives you $25 credit just for buying a Nexus 7! $25!

4. Size. This was the make-or-break for me. I'm an avid reader. On the iPad, I fell in deep, deep love with iBooks. It was the PERFECTION of e-reader apps. Still is, in my opinion. I can get all my college books online in PDF, and I also have ePubs that I read, mark, highlight in. Owning an Android phone, I've shopped the apps, but nothing came close to the reading experience of iBooks on the iPad's nice 10" screen, the 5+ highlighting colors, and the shelves to keep my books organized.

That being said, I had reservations in buying this, as I doubted it could compete.

Even w/o a good reader app, it won. A 7" screen for a guy like me, who's NEVER at home, was a much better match than I imagined! It LITERALLY fits in a jacket pocket. Now pants, it'll depend on what kind, but the thought is that I can, will, and have taken this with me everywhere! It fits in my glove compartment, messenger bag, suit coat, jacket, you name it. With that alone, it beat the huge iPad, because now I was reading everywhere, instead of just at home. To make things better, I found an e-reader that's a very close 2nd to iBooks, Mantano reader (GET IT NOW!!), so I don't miss the iPad at all!

Cons: Hmm. Well, ummmm.... there's, no.... I got nothing. =)

Actually, I have a couple.

1. No HDMI port. That is a bummer, especially since Google is pushing their movie and TV selections so much, you'd think they'd give you a way to watch it on more than a 7" screen...

2. No 3G model... yet. ;D

3. Google Now needs some more work and features if it's going to compete w/ Siri. Not that it's bad, just limited...

4. Not many accessories, but how many do you need for a tablet? Phones, sure. But who would honestly dock their cutting-board-sized tablet? More case choices would be nice, though...

Basically, I've waited years to buy a tablet, waiting for a decent, GOOD Android tablet. Here it is, finally. It's waay cheaper than iPad, but not in quality AT ALL. It's running pure Android OS, unlike the Kindle Fires. Combining a quad-core processor with Jelly Bean means it's a MUCH better experience than any other Android tablet (I'm looking at you, Xoom), even rivaling/beating(?) an iOS experience!

Buy a Nexus 7 if you want a 7", $400 tablet for only $200 from Google.

Buy an iPad if you want a 10", $500 tablet from Apple.

Other than that, there is no difference or advantage.

Rate this if this review helped you in the slightest! (or even if you read it all... =D)

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Lorex 8 Channel Pentaplex Network DVR with CD-RW and 300GB HDD

Lorex 8 Channel Pentaplex Network DVR with CD-RW and 300GB HDD
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
List Price: $1,800.00
Sale Price: $688.00
Today's Bonus: 62% Off
Buy Now

The recorder works well all features pretty much as advertised. Motion detection recording is great. The event log or date time range box to find past events took a little getting used to vs. just a vcr screen type scroll back thru old recording date and times. But it makes sense after some use. During playback its odd if you are in 4 camera screen or one camer view and the camere that had recorded activity reaches the end of its recording fo rthat period the view goes back to all 8 cameras, so you have to reselect one or 4 camer view when playback for the desired camera resumes would rather have a blank screen and the time counter continue running or skip to the next recording event for the selected camera.

The remote web viewing is really quirky, IE7 blows up at some point almost everytime I am viewing remotely. On my laptop the remote screen does not always size correctly so the controls on the bottom are cutoff no scroll to get to them, and the "power" button is cutoff so task manager is the only way to end a session. On my local network desktop the screen size is ok and it blows up less often. Configuration should have an option to not require a password to close the remote viewing session, its just annowing to enter a password to quit remote viewing every time.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Memorex 700MB/80-Minute 52x CD-R Media 100-Pack Spindle

Memorex 700MB/80-Minute 52x CD-R Media 100-Pack Spindle
Customer Ratings: 3.5 stars
List Price: $27.99
Sale Price: $24.53
Today's Bonus: 12% Off
Buy Now

Before I start, I would like to remind people that compatability problems still exist with CDRW burners. Some media brands will just work better on certain hardware/burners. On reviews like these, it's best to state your burner as well so readers will have an idea of what media matches best with what hardware/burner. I would also like to remind people that compatability problems exists between CDRs and late model CD players wether on a boombox or on your car's player.

Ok now onto my review... I have a LiteOn CDRW 40x burner (on my old PC), Teac DVD+/CDRW combo burner and an LG-Hitachi 48x CDRW burner. Memorex media works flawlessly on all these burners! Music CDs that I made plays perfectly on all my components 5-disc Sony caroussel from the early 90s, my DVD player from 2000 and the rest of my CD players in the house and not to mention my car's CD player. No problems at all.

The only problem I encountered was when I made VCDs using these disc. They "sometimes" wouldn't work on my Panasonic DVD/VCD player (year 2000). They would give me playback problems such as pixelation and audio skipping! But when using another brand, such as TDK or Fuji, I don't get these playback problems. The Memorex VCD would work on my dirt-cheat Apex though. Further, establishing the idea that media do have compatability problems.

Considering my hardware, the brands that gave me no problems at all were: TDK, Fuji and Maxell they just work flawlessly on whatever I throw at them. I would put the Memorex up there with the other brands but they seem to be only good when it comes to music and data but now much on video projects. But since most people use their CDRs for music and data anyway, these CDRs are still a great buy in my opinion! I currently have TDKs and Memorexs.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Lexar Professional 1000x 64GB CompactFlash Card LCF64GCTBNA1000

Lexar Professional 1000x 64GB CompactFlash Card LCF64GCTBNA1000
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
List Price: $472.11
Sale Price: $249.00
Today's Bonus: 47% Off
Buy Now

Customer review from the Amazon Vine Program இ Fuzzy Wuzzy's Summary:

ѾѾѾѾѾ Highly recommended with warm fuzzies!

փ Positives:

փ Screaming fast performance, but only if your high-end camera and newer-model card reader can keep up with this card's UDMA-7 read/write speeds.

փ Supports the Video Performance Guarantee (VPG-20) specification for professional-quality 1080P HD video capture at 20 MB/sec speed.

փ Includes downloadable "Image Rescue 4" software that can aid in recovering photo and video files lost due to deletion or card corruption.

փ Limited lifetime warranty.

ჯ Negatives:

ჯ To fully take advantage of this card's write speed from the camera to the memory card, your professional-class camera must be able to write the data out that fast. And to take advantage of its read speed from the memory card reader to your computer, your card reader needs to be able to write that fast.

As both the speed and capacity of CompactFlash cards keeps increasing every year, this UDMA-7 card from Lexar yet again pushes the outer limits of read/write speeds. It was not that long ago when a "133x" CompactFlash card seemed really fast. But this ever-increasing need for speed and capacity becomes more and more important as more cameras can now record 1080P HD video, frame rates increase, and both the frames per second and continuous burst shooting capabilities of prosumer-class and professional-class cameras increase with each year's new dSLR models.

I received this Lexar Professional 1000x 16-GB CompactFlash Card shortly after I had upgraded my Canon 7D's firmware from version 1.2.5 to the latest version 2.0.0. Canon released this version 2.0.0 firmware for their 7D about three weeks ago at the start of August. Having used Canon dSLRs since their EOS D60 in 2002, I have been accustomed to a variety of Canon's firmware updates for their dSLR cameras. But this version 2.0.0 firmware update for their 7D is one of the largest and most significant firmware updates that I have ever seen. I almost feel like I have a brand new version of the 7D by just updating to this new firmware version. Included in this large firmware update is a huge improvement to the 7D's continuous-shooting buffer depth, increasing the continuous burst buffer space from the original specs of 15 RAW files to a whopping 25 RAW files. Combined with the 7D's 8 frames/second speed in high-speed continuous shooting mode, this makes the camera even more ideal for action/sports/wildlife photography and it starts to edge closer to UDMA-7 speeds. But, alas, Canon states that even with this new 7D firmware 2.0: "UDMA 7 CF memory card read/write speeds are not fully supported with the EOS 7D Digital SLR camera. If using UDMA 7 memory cards, the read/write speeds will be equivalent to UDMA 6."

To both test the improvements to my Canon 7D's continuous-shooting buffer depth and to also test how fast my 7D can write files to this Lexar 1000x 16-GB CompactFlash card, I performed a series of tests after upgrading my 7D to its new firmware version 2.0.0. These tests were performed after I freshly formatted this Lexar 16-GB card in my 7D camera and had a fully charged battery. The following measurements consist of shooting my 7D in two higher ISO settings to purposely create larger file sizes (versus shooting at ISO 100). I usually try hard to go no higher than ISO 400 to minimize noise being introduced, but I will sometimes go up to ISO 3200 for low-light or nighttime hand-held shooting, and I try to avoid going beyond ISO 3200 unless I really have to. So I performed a series of continuous burst shooting at both ISO 400 and ISO 3200 with the camera set to output either only L(arge)-Fine JPG files, only L(arge)-size RAW files, or dual Large-RAW and Large-Fine-JPG outputs.

For each of the six RAW/JPG and ISO combinations below, I list the number of images that can be stored on this Lexar 16-GB card.

For the four L(arge)-RAW-only and dual Large-RAW and Large-Fine-JPG tests below, I kept shooting the camera in high-speed continuous mode until its buffer filled up and it had to pause. During this time, I tracked the number of seconds that the camera's card status light remained lit while it was busy writing files to the Lexar card. I then recorded the total number of files that were written onto the card during the continuous burst shooting and the total number of bytes used by those files. For each of the RAW/JPG and ISO combinations, I repeated the burst-shooting three times and averaged the results. There was very little variation for the file count, byte size, and timings in between each set of three tests within a group. From the total bytes written and seconds that it took to write to the memory card, I arrived at a "Bytes/second" write speed for writing data from the camera to this Lexar card.

L-size RAW only at ISO 400

--------------------------------------------------

Maximum images that can be stored: 592

Files recorded into continuous burst buffer (average of 3 tries): 29

Total bytes of all files recorded onto card (average of 3 tries): 680,617,662

Seconds that card status light remained lit (average of 3 tries): 10

Bytes/seconds = 680,617,662/10 = 68 MB/sec

L-size RAW only at ISO 3200

--------------------------------------------------

Maximum images that can be stored: 540

Files recorded into continuous burst buffer (average of 3 tries): 23

Total bytes of all files recorded onto card (average of 3 tries): 707,076,916

Seconds that card status light remained lit (average of 3 tries): 10

Bytes/seconds = 707,076,916/10 = 71 MB/sec

L-size RAW with L-fine JPG at ISO 400

--------------------------------------------------

Maximum images that can be stored: 461

Files recorded into continuous burst buffer (average of 3 tries): 38 (19 CR2/JPG pairs)

Total bytes of all files recorded onto card (average of 3 tries): 568,274,502

Seconds that card status light remained lit (average of 3 tries): 15

Bytes/seconds = 568,274,502/15 = 38 MB/sec

L-size RAW with L-fine JPG at ISO 3200

--------------------------------------------------

Maximum images that can be stored: 425

Files recorded into continuous burst buffer (average of 3 tries): 34 (17 CR2/JPG pairs)

Total bytes of all files recorded onto card (average of 3 tries): 608,925,777

Seconds that card status light remained lit (average of 3 tries): 16

Bytes/seconds = 608,925,777/16 = 38 MB/sec

The two ISO400/3200 tests for shooting only L(arge)-Fine JPG required a slightly different approach. Unlike the above four L(arge)-RAW-only and dual Large-RAW and Large-Fine-JPG tests where my 7D noticeably paused when the camera's internal buffer filled up and the camera then waited for a short duration for the Lexar card to catch up, when shooting JPG-only, there was a far shorter pause after about 6 to 10 seconds of shooting and then the camera would quickly shoot 3 or 4 more shots followed by another very quick pause. So to measure the throughput to the Lexar card when shooting JPG-only, I kept the shutter button constantly pressed for exactly 30 seconds, and then I also timed how long the card status light remained lit. As with the numbers for the "L-size RAW with L-fine JPG" listed above, there is a speed overhead when shooting JPG, either in JPG-only mode or dual RAW/JPG output. But as the numbers below show, it is interesting that after I kept the shutter button constantly pressed for 30 seconds, the camera continued writing to the Lexar card for only an additional 4 or 5 seconds. My 7D camera's internal pipeline is the actual limiting factor in how fast it could clear out its buffer and write everything on the card. With the 7D's new 2.0.0 firmware version, Canon states that the 7D's buffer can store about 130 L(arge)-Fine JPG files. So the extra 4 to 5 seconds of latency is due to the camera writing the remaining buffer contents onto the card.

L-fine JPG only at ISO 400

--------------------------------------------------

Maximum images that can be stored: 2084

Seconds that I kept the shutter button pressed: 30

Files recorded after shooting for 30 seconds (average of 3 tries): 235 (almost 8 shots/second!)

Total bytes of all files recorded onto card (average of 3 tries): 1,619,609,533

Seconds that card status light remained lit (average of 3 tries): 34

Bytes/seconds = 1,619,609,533/34 = 48 MB/sec

L-fine JPG only at ISO 3200

--------------------------------------------------

Maximum images that can be stored: 2026

Seconds that I kept the shutter button pressed: 30

Files recorded after shooting for 30 seconds (average of 3 tries): 230 (almost 8 shots/second!)

Total bytes of all files recorded onto card (average of 3 tries): 1,732,094,464

Seconds that card status light remained lit (average of 3 tries): 35

Bytes/seconds = 1,732,094,464/35 = 49 MB/sec

From the above results, a RAW-only continuous burst write speed of 68 MB/sec at ISO 400 is quite fast, and being able to continuously shoot more than 20 RAWs at 8 frames per second is ideal for action/sports/wildlife photography, but it still does not fully take advantage of this card's 1000x UDMA-7 maximum speed capability. But my tests proved to me that (1) the new firmware update for my 7D did indeed dramatically boosted the continuous burst buffer of my 7D, and (2) even with the 7D's fast shooting, the limiting factor was still the camera and I never even once bumped up against this card's upper speed ceiling for either shooting extended 1080P HD videos at 30 frames/second or high-speed continuous photo shoots.

I currently do not have a UDMA-7 USB 3.0 card reader, so I did not test this card's read speed when transferring files from a UDMA-7-compatible card reader to a computer. Although it may matter for your purposes, my card reader's read speed is not that important to me. When I need to transfer files from multiple CompactFlash cards to my computer, I use two separate USB 2.0 card readers that are both plugged into my computer, and I just keep feeding them cards while I work on other things. I will eventually purchase a UDMA-7 USB 3.0 card reader. But for now, using two USB 2.0 card readers to simultaneously transfer files to my computer works fine for me :)

Inside this card's box package are two sheets. One sheet states that in order to use these Lexar Professional 1000x CompactFlash cards with Lexar's Lexar Media Inc. Dual Slot USB 3.0 Reader Professional (LRW307URBNA), you must download and update its firmware from the URL on Lexar's Web site that is mentioned on the sheet. The other sheet includes a serial number code for use in activating Lexar's "Image Rescue 4" software. You can download the "Image Rescue 4" software from the URL on Lexar's Web site that is mentioned on this sheet.

The downloadable Lexar "Image Rescue 4" software that is included free with this CompactFlash card is similar to Transcend's "RecoverRx" and SanDisk's "RescuePro" software. As with software that tries to recover files that were deleted on a computer hard drive, the "Image Rescue 4" scans and looks for deleted/missing files that can be recovered. If you accidentally deleted some photo or video files from a camera memory card, your best chance for success is to immediately stop using the card, remove it from the camera, and try to recover it using the "Image Rescue 4" (or similar) software. If you have taken additional shots on your camera after accidentally deleting some files, there is a greater chance that the new photo/video files may have overwritten some part of the original image data that you are trying to recover. And if the card is actually damaged or corrupted, the data recovery software may also be of no use.

௫ Fuzzy Wuzzy's Conclusion:

This is an excellent UDMA-7 CompactFlash card that is suitable for the most demanding, large and fast camera buffer, and high frame-rate photo and video applications. Most consumer-class and prosumer-class dSLR cameras currently cannot write to this card fast enough, so your money may be better spent on a less expensive UDMA-6/600x, 400x, or slower card, especially if you have an entry-level dSLR. UDMA-6/600x CompactFlash cards have been on the market now for about three years, their prices have become cheaper, and their write speeds are a better match for the current crop of consumer/prosumer-class dSLR cameras. But some of the latest professional-grade dSLR cameras, such as Canon's EOS 1D-X and Nikon's D4, are now appearing that do fully support UDMA-7 speed. Likewise, if you rarely shoot in high-speed continuous burst modes that are indispensable for action/sports/wildlife photography and you rarely shoot 1080P HD video using your dSLR, a CompactFlash card with a speed rating of 133x, 266x, or 400x may be perfectly fine for your needs, and you can use the money that you saved to buy better high-end lenses :-) because, at the time of this review's writing, this 1000x card does cost more than most other 16-GB cards and you are paying a premium for its speed when used in a camera with fast photo/video shooting that can quickly feed data into the card. Action, sports, and wildlife photography can really benefit from a dSLR that has a high frames/second capability (at least 3 or 4 frames/second), a high internal memory buffer to keep the continuous shooting going without stutters, and fast hardware to write all that data to a UDMA-7 card like this Lexar CompactFlash. With this kind of action/sports/wildlife photography, I usually capture several perfect "caught in the act" shots while deleting plenty of other shots.

But one purchasing decision that you have to consider is if your camera can write data fast enough onto this card to fully make use of its speed, or if you have a UDMA-7 USB 3.0 card reader that can read data from this card at its maximum speed. A UDMA-7-enabled card reader is inexpensive to purchase, and the high speed at which you can transfer files from a UDMA-7-enabled card reader to your computer may be enough justification to buy this card. If you have a prosumer-class dSLR and you shoot a lot of 1080P HD video using the highest frame rate, this is also an excellent card choice. And if you have a professional-class dSLR that can output at UDMA-7 speeds, this card is a must-buy!

At the present time, the 16-GB size of this card being reviewed is my favorite CompactFlash card size for the main reason that I do not like the idea of "keeping all of my photo/video eggs in just one (or a few) baskets". Even though I have never encountered a complete card failure and inability to retrieve the files from any of my SanDisk, Lexar, or Kingston CompactFlash cards (knock hard on wood), and I have only encountered an occasional rare corrupted single file here or there, I still like the idea that my complete set of images, which may include many thousands of dual RAW/JPG files and HD videos that sometimes add up to 400 GB of data for a three or four week travel outing, are spread across multiple cards in case one particular card becomes totally unreadable, or even accidentally lost. And as added insurance, during the trip, I copy the files from my CompactFlash cards onto a laptop's hard drive or another portable hard drive. Eventually, I will migrate more of my card usage up to 32 GB sizes. But I do not trust the idea of putting all the photos and videos from a 3-week travel outing on a handful of 128-GB cards just yet, because if just one 128-GB card gets lost or corrupted, I lose a huge amount of photos :-) So far, after filling up this Lexar 16-GB card with photos/videos more than 22 times, I have not encountered any glitches, corrupted files, or data loss.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Sigma 18-50mm f/3.5-5.6 DC HSM Wide Angle Zoom Lens for Nikon

Sigma 18-50mm f/3.5-5.6 DC HSM Wide Angle Zoom Lens for Nikon D90, D80, D70, D60, D50, D40, D40X, D5000, D3000, D700, D300, D200, & D3 Digital SLRs *
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
Buy Now
I couldn't believe this lens was under 100 dlls. I've also got one in the 55-200mm range and it's just as good as this one.

I bought it because a friend of mine dropped the camera with the original nikon on it and it broke the support. I chose it because I like a lot the other one I have. This one autofocuses just as or faster than the nikon that comes standard with the camera.

Personally I prefer this one because it feels sturdier and the finish makes it look less toy-like. It also has a metal attaching ring, not like the nikon that has thin plastic one.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Epson B11B178061 Perfection V750-M Pro Photo Scanner

Epson B11B178061 Perfection V750-M Pro Photo Scanner
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
List Price: $949.99
Sale Price: $799.00
Today's Bonus: 16% Off
Buy Now

The Epson V750 is a great scanner. We bought it for film and slide scanning and have not been disappointed in its performance. It's fast, has fantastic resolution (rivaling much more expensive film scanners) and will do multiple slides or negative strips. The "but" refers to the included software. The Epson scanning software is quite good, but I had hoped to be able to use the SilverFast package, which was supposed to be a full software package. Unfortunately, it's a "crippled" application, lacking the ability to convert multiple slides in a single scan into individual pictures (which the full application CAN do). This was a major disappointment. So, hardware great, software not so much.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>