Showing posts with label inexpensive digital camera. Show all posts
Showing posts with label inexpensive digital camera. Show all posts

Zeiss 18mm f/3.5 Distagon T* ZE Series Lens for Canon EOS

Zeiss 18mm f/3.5 Distagon T* ZE Series Lens for Canon EOS Digital SLR Cameras
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
List Price: $1,495.00
Sale Price: $1,395.00
Today's Bonus: 7% Off
Buy Now

I purchased this lens a few months ago and it is amazing. I slapped this beast on my Canon 5D Mark III and it is now my go-to. The image quality is astonishing.

I did a ton of research on wide angle glass for over a year before going for this. I was considering the Canon 24mm TS II, but I couldn't justify it considering I already have a 24-105L. The 24mm TS II is much better in terms of image quality, but it isn't wide enough. I noticed a difference in quality with the first photo I took using this lens.

There is some distortion, so it's not particularly great for architectural work, but it's fantastic for landscape work. This is the smartest purchase I've made since getting the Mark III.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Motorola EM326g Prepaid Phone (Net10)

Motorola EM326g Prepaid Phone
Customer Ratings: 3.5 stars
List Price: $99.99
Sale Price: $36.00
Today's Bonus: 64% Off
Buy Now

I bought this phone from Target after I inadvertently cracked the LCD screen on my LG 300. This phone has some very nice features: Bluetooth, Digital Camera (1.3 Megapixels), microSD Card Slot, MP3 Player, and FM Radio. It also has a Browser, but you can only access the Net10 site with it; access to all other sites are restricted.

I'll briefly touch on each of these and other features:

Bluetooth

The bluetooth works surprisingly well. I can connect the phone to my iPAQ 111 Pocket PC using bluetooth for transferring files between the units. I also have no trouble connecting the phone to my Garmin Nuvi 360 GPS unit and my Plantronics Headset. Once my Nuvi is connected to the phone, I can use the Nuvi as a speaker phone. I can also use the Nuvi to dial and receive phone calls. SWEEeeet!

Digital Camera

The quality of the picture taken with the 1.3-megapixel camera is pretty good. Each JPEG file is typically less than 100 Kb.

microSD Card Slot

The microSD slot will only read a microSD card (2 GB or less), not a microSDHC (microSD, High Capacity 4 GB or more). If you insert a microSDHC card, you will get the message: Please remove card and insert again.

MP3 Player

The sound quality through my Sony earphones is decent enough. The MP3 player, unfortunately, doesn't have an equalizer.

FM Radio

The FM Radio reception is as good as any portable radio. Since your earphones function as an antenna, the FM Radio won't work unless you have your earphones plugged in.

Browser

Internet access is restricted to only the Net10 Web site. (Interestingly, some people reportedly have full (unrestricted) Internet access on the browser.) I tried a few URL's (e.g. google) but each time I got the error message: HTTP error forbidden.

The Net10 Web site has links for Sports, Weather, and News. The page loads are excruciatingly slow! It can take a few minutes for a page to load, if at all. Sometimes, the page just hangs. You would have to be pretty desperate to want to use the browser!

e-mail

I tried to e-mail an attachment a couple of times but had no success with it. 3.5 minutes (1 minute standard rate + 2.5 minutes e-mailing rate) were deducted from my account on _each_ attempt, even though the e-mail failed to get through! The error message: Sending failed: Connection error.

o Miscellaneous Features

The phone has all the "standard" features that come with most cell phones: polyphonic ring tones, games (e.g. Need For Speed Carbon), and tools (e.g. calculator and alarm clock).

o Usability

Service: The standby battery life is about 2 to 3 days. Cell phone reception from the Net10 service is decent enough (Net10 actually uses the AT&T network). It comes with 300 minutes of free airtime (a 30-d0llar value).

Volume Control: I really like the volume control buttons on the left side of the phone. You can quickly set the phone to Silent, Vibrate, or one of seven volume levels without having to wade through the menus.

Form: The phone is very compact. It is the same size as the LG 300.

---

The biggest gripe I have about the phone is the crippled browser. Other than that, I don't really have very much else to complain about it. For me, an absolute must-have on a phone is bluetooth and this feature works flawlessly on the EM 326g. Overall, I'm quite happy with it. For the price, it's really not a bad deal. If you're looking for a prepaid phone, this one's definitely worth consideration.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Canon PowerShot ELPH 500 HS 12.1 MP CMOS Digital Camera

Canon PowerShot ELPH 500 HS 12.1 MP CMOS Digital Camera with Full HD Video and Ultra Wide Angle Lens
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
List Price: $279.00
Sale Price: $150.99
Today's Bonus: 46% Off
Buy Now

Please note that for a point and shoot, this camera deserves a 5-star review. But in fairness to certain small details, and Amazon's inability to allow users to give partial stars (e.g. 4.75 stars), I will have to settle for 4-stars.

Cosmetic PROS: Unlike some of the SD and Elph cameras in the past, this one feels solid. Canon even improved, to some extent, the flimsy-feeling battery door. It is a HUGE improvement over the previous flimsy plastic doors on earlier models. The large 3"x1" screen is sharp and beautiful and gives an accurate depiction of what your camera will capture. Switching between full program mode and full automatic is a simple slide button on the top of the camera allowing an advanced user and a novice to both have their options easily. This also prevents any accidental mode changes that can happen with setting-wheels or external buttons.

Cosmetic CONS: The lens cover seems a touch too loose, at least on my specific camera. It rattles and moves slightly when handling the camera after the power is off and the cover is closed. Not a deal breaker by any stretch of the imagination, but you might notice this rattle too. The card slot, at least on my specific camera, is strangely snug. When I slide the card into place, there is some friction that made me question whether I was forcing it into the slot in the wrong direction. I pushed the card in until it clicked into place, but then it did not rebound like normal (like when clicking the top of a retracting ball-point pen.) Again, it may just be my specific camera. (Edit: I forgot to mention that while the battery door is now more durable, the A/V door feels very flimsy. It doesn't swing out like a door. Rather, like the cap on a tupperware drinking bottle lid, the door detaches from the camera but remains linked to it via a moderately flexible piece of plastic. And because the door snaps firmly in place when closed, you really need fingernails to get any sort of leverage to open it. For what its worth, if I had to choose only one, I still much prefer the more durable battery door than a durable A/V door.)(Edit: Also, while I love the huge screen, please note that if you wear polarized sunglasses, you may have issues shooting on a sunny day with the screen appearing to disappear. This is more of a problem of the polarized lenses than the camera, but its worth noting.)

Touch screen: Personally, I prefer standard buttons. However, this touch screen is fine. It is big enough that my fingers are able to select menu items easily. For those of you coming from touch screen cell phones, you may find this screen less sensitive than your phone, thus requiring you to apply more finger pressure than you are used to. This isn't a flaw in my mind, but I can see where others may think the screen is being non-responsive. The lanyard comes with a tightening slide. And this slide also has a fine point on it to help you make selections on the touch screen if you are having problems--similar to the stylus of the old palm pilots. Hard to use if your hand is in the lanyard, but hey, its a start!

Features: My main reasons for purchasing this camera was to get aperture priority, shutter priority, and a macro setting as options. Unlike the Canon's S95 with an external ring control, the aperture settings on the 500HS are buried in the touch screen menus. That is fine for my uses and will be fairly intuitive to previous Canon users. The f2.0 aperture setting DELIVERS! For those wanting shallow depth of fields on their point and shoot...wow! I loved this! I haven't had any problems (yet) with the camera focusing on the wrong subject even in macro setting. And because this comes with Focus Lock, you will probably be able to work around that problem if it ever arises. Strangely, but not a deal breaker, the camera doesn't seem to have a BULB setting for shutter speed and maxes out at 15". I don't use that setting and speeds enough to warrant complaint, and maybe there are slower shutter speeds and I just missed them, but I figured I would share that tidbit with others who may be needing those speeds. It is just odd considering my old-old Canon SD630 had bulb setting and I think 2 minutes (but its been so long, I may be mistaken.)(edit: Just realized that this camera doesn't have exposure bracketing (where it takes three automatic shots with different exposures.) It still has exposure adjustment allowing you to +/exposure stops, but I am a little surprised to not find this previously included feature. There is something called Best Image where the camera takes 5 continuous shots but automatically keeps only the best shot, but this seems to be geared toward facial expressions/blinks/etc. and not exposures. The lack of bracketing is only a minor drawback for me--heck, its taken me a couple of weeks to realize its not present--but its worth mentioning.)

Video: Because I didn't buy this for video, I cannot well judge its abilities. I will only say that the few test videos I took were sharp, with decent sound. However, the volume of the voice of the person holding the camera will be noticeably less. Whether thats a good thing or bad is up to you. Note too that the video is recorded in stereo sound. But I can't gauge its quality. (edit: Having tested the video out more, the sound from the person recording the video (i.e. behind the camera) is actually much better than I originally thought. Apparently, I had the volume turned down too low. But once I adjusted the setting, the sound was rather clear and crisp. I was very impressed.)

Review pics: Everything on this camera is on the touch screen EXCEPT for the review button. The lone, solitary button on the rear of the camera is dedicated to allowing you review your shots in one touch. After hitting the review button, you can either slide your finger across the screen, tap an arrow on the side of the screen, or even BUMP the side of the camera with your finger to see the next shot! There is also a motion detector or internal accelerometer of some sort that allows you to quickly scan through your review pics by tilting the camera slightly on its side. Those last two features are very reminiscent of smartphone technology and makes the camera feel that much more advanced than others. (edit: After more use, I *really* need to emphasize that I like the bump feature! It makes reviewing a bunch of pics really very easy!)

Compared to S95, the 500HS is in the lead in my opinion. The S95 was supposed to be the intermediate step between point and shoot cameras and DSLRs, giving some advanced features without the expense of the DSLRs. The 500 HS is $100-$150 cheaper, more compact, and has a ton of settings and features--yes, it does have miniature model shooting mode and 1080p HD video. I think this camera is the new intermediate step to the DSLR. To give you more perspective, my other option to fit my needs would be either a DSLR Rebel or D50 or D60...$500 at absolute minimum for the body, plus another $299 for a macro lens. In other words, $800 minimum to get me the features I needed. Compare that to the 500 HS at $299! BARGAIN!

Now, I haven't had time, yet, to see if the image stabilization and low light settings are better than in cameras past--especially since I normally have "IS" turned off. So if those features are important to you, maybe visit a camera store and see the camera in person. But since the release of this camera was supposed to be March (if I am not mistaken) and since the earthquake hit Japan in March, you may have a heck of a time finding this camera in stock anywhere. I know there are a few pink colored models for sale. And I completely lucked out with finding this silver model, but keep trying! It seems that a few more stores that I frequented started getting these cameras trickling in over the past 10 days. But they seemed to be getting only 2 or 3 cameras at a time.

Good luck!

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Pentax K-x 12.4MP Digital SLR with 2.7 inch LCD and 18-55mm

Pentax K-x 12.4MP Digital SLR with 2.7 inch LCD and 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AL Lens
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
As soon as I saw this red camera, I absolutely had to have it. I did tremendous amounts of research to figure out if it was actually worth upgrading from my D40, then ordered it the day it became available on Amazon. While a few things might have been nicer on the Nikon, this camera is a wonderful upgrade. If the color isn't enough (this is for the red model if reviews become merged later on), it has some very nice specs to it. Ability to use essentially any Pentax lens ever made (and auto-focus), ISO 6400, 1/6000 shutter, many built-in imaging features(HDR, filters, color tweaks). This thing is truly a beast!

Body; When I first pulled it from the box, I was a little discouraged. While it is a well made camera, it does have a much lighter and cheaper feel than the Nikon had. The over-all fit and finish is fine, but the plastics don't feel as high quality. Perhaps it's because they're smooth, but it's also just my opinion. A slight concern, too, is that the red appears to be "painted", seeing as the inside of the doors are white. Overtime there's a chance the color could rub off, but I'm hoping this does not happen. Materials aside, the camera does have a nice feel. I have large hands with very long, slim fingers and the grip fits my hands great. The primary controls are within easy reach, with only a couple odd deviations(such as the flash and green soft-button).

The LCD on the back is average. It's your typical resolution, but works fine for previewing. Now the viewfinder I find to be more difficult to use than the Nikon. The focal point does not illuminate, making it both difficult to find and difficult to tell what's being focused. Also I can't seem to see all the specs in the viewfinder. I do wear glasses so I can't press my eye right against the eyepiece, but this wasn't a problem with the Nikon. While this certainly isn't a deal killer, it would be something to keep in mind.

Shooting performance is great. This camera is very fast. Start up time is essentially instant, focusing is lightning fast and it can take nearly 6FPS at it's peak. I have found low-light focusing to be a little worse than the Nikon, but that's also because the Pentax lacks an AF assist light. While it can use the flash, it still isn't quite as accurate as the Nikon and it's little light.

Image quality is very nice. Noise is well controlled under most all ISO settings. ISO6400 is very usable in average lighting conditions. But as light decreases, noise becomes more apparent. Many images from this camera do seem a bit more noisy than other cameras at similar ISO settings, but it still can produce comparable prints. Colors tend to be on the flat side using default settings, but with insane amounts of tweaks, this can be changed to whatever you please. White balance is managed very nicely too, with much better auto WB under incandescent lighting than the Nikon (though manual setting is still the best). The stabilizer works well. It's not as apparent when taking casual shots, but when using liveview, it is very easy to watch (and hear!) it working. While still on image quality, the movie mode actually astonished me. The quality is very sharp. While this is not a movie camera, the videos produced are supurb. Just realize AF is disabled and the stabilizer does interfere with the audio.

Honest, I suppose my only real complaint about this camera are the batteries. Why Pentax decided to go with AA's rather than a lithium pack is beyond me... Aside from being a bit clunky (4 batteries over a single pack) the system is rather buggy. I have been told the "batteries are depleted" but then restart the camera and continue to shoot for hours. Even after upgrading to firmware 1.1, the battery meter tends to jump around. If Pentax had gone with a lithium pack, this camera would be perfect 5 stars.

So to sum up, if you want a camera somewhere between the Nikon D90 and D5000 that strays away from the "normal" brands, this is a camera to consider.

--Update--

After having the camera for almost a month, I figured I'd post a little update. I still love the camera. I've had no problems to speak of. Pictures are looking very nice; people are always complimenting me on the camera and the photos it takes :)

I guess my only real complaints would still be the batteries and the white balance. The battery meter, as mentioned above, is very off. But all in all it works well enough to guess how much juice is remaining. As for the white balance, I've noticed it tends to be a bit more off than the Nikon was. I have a couple flashes, and it seems to be more-so with the Pentax 360FGZ so I'm not even sure if I should blame the camera or not...

These things aside, I'm really loving this camera. I'm a very difficult person to please but I'm exceptionally happy with my purchase.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Sony Bloggie Touch Camera, 4-Hour (Black)

Sony Bloggie Touch Camera, 4-Hour
Customer Ratings: 3.5 stars
Buy Now
I've had this camera for about a week now and have been loving it ever since. I've used another "flip" camcorder and the Bloggie Touch puts it to shame.

Pros:

1. Love the quick on and record. Great for spontaneous videos of the little one.

2. The touch screen interface makes it both useful and fun to use the big screen.

3. The still pictures come out brilliant, when the lighting and focus is good.

4. The battery charges up super fast and stays with you for a whole day of shooting.

5. The image stabilization is good. You can take decent video while walking around and panning too. Note that it is not optical, but electronic SteadyShot stabilization.

6. The lens is very good quality and the pictures are crisp.

7. Really like the "snap picture while recording" feature. I find myself using that feature the most. The video doesn't stall while the picture (full 12M resolution) is being taken and since the focus and exposure are usually locked well while you're in the middle of the video, the pictures come out great.

Cons:

1. In low lighting, there is quite a bit of graininess and using the digital zoom makes it much worse.

2. While the lens is good quality, the auto-focus mechanism is really very slow. If you move around the camera too much before focus has locked on, the auto-focus will almost never lock.

3. What I really miss with this camera is a flash. Even a tiny one would help with low light pictures.

4. Minor annoyance: to preview a picture right after you take it, you have to go through at least two clicks. Sony could have designed it so that it always goes to the last picture taken by default, instead of the thumbnail list of all pictures/video on the device.

I decided to purchase this camera over a still camera that can do video because:

1. This one is dead simple. One button to turn on, one to take video and one to take stills. This makes it both easy and quick to use.

2. This one can do 1080p video and 720p at 60fps.

3. Its under $200 and is smaller than your phone.

4. Its got internal flash and USB connector no more SD cards or cables. 8GB is enough to get you through the day before you can come back to your laptop to dump the pictures.

I decided to purchase this camera over other ones in the same category because:

1. Its got a big display and the touch screen is fun to use.

2. Its got a better lens system than the others.

3. Its got (some) image stabilization.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Tokina 35mm f/2.8 AT-X PRO DX Macro Lens for Canon Digital SLR

Tokina 35mm f/2.8 AT-X PRO DX Macro Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
Buy Now
I was all set to buy Canon's 60mm f/2.8 macro...but I was hesitant because I really wanted something in the 30-50mm range that I could double up with as a portrait lens. I didn't even know this lens existed until I randomly stumbled upon it at POTN....and the rest, as they say, is history.

For the price, the quality of photos is excellent on my 40D. Like most macro primes, it is excellent wide-open (f/2.8).

It's a true 1:1 macro....but the short focal length means you'll have a really tough time using 1:1 in the field (without a macro flash attachment). If you are really serious about macro shots, you may want to look at a 100mm or 150mm focal length macro (giving you more space between lens and subject). But I plan to use this lens a lot as a portrait lens as well as close ups, this is not a big problem. Just understand that a 35mm macro does bring some limitations....but it's perfect for what I wanted.

If you're use to Canon ring-motor auto-focus (and every other lens I own with AF have the Canon ring motors!), then the slower focus speed will take some getting use to. The range limiter helps, and the AF/MF switch is pretty easy to engage/disengage. MF using the live view works very well.

Build is excellent. Not quite L-quality....but then what is for the price?

All and all....well done, Tokina.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Logitech Speaker System Z623

Logitech Speaker System Z623
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
List Price: $149.99
Sale Price: $116.99
Today's Bonus: 22% Off
Buy Now

As always, I'm completely thrilled with Logitech and its products, they never disappoint. For a mid-tier speaker system, this setup is fantastic. Excellent bass/mids/highs. Love the bass control knob and headset hook in on the control speaker.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Apple MacBook Air MC966LL/A 13.3-Inch Laptop (OLD VERSION)

Apple MacBook Air MC966LL/A 13.3-Inch Laptop
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
Buy Now
*2012 Pro and Air models are available but the designs remain the same meaning the physical aspects covered below are the same as well.

The primary features of the 2012 13" MacBook Air are:

Ivy Bridge processor + HD 4000 graphics (60% better performance)

USB 3.0

720p webcam

2x SSD read speeds. Write speeds didn't change.

$100 price drop

I've owned the machine for 10 months now and have simplified the review for your convenience.

Things I like:

+ Light weight; 2.9 lbs (1.3 kg). You can easily hold it with one hand the MBP 13" is noticeably heavier at 4.5 lbs.

+ Solid build quality like the MBPs. Chassis is rock solid, no keyboard flex, screen housing is rigid with minor flex in the middle.

+ Better ergonomics than the MBPs; the palm rest edges don't dig into your wrists like the edges on the MBPs do.

+ Same fluid multitouch trackpad and the backlit keyboard makes a return.

+ The screen is a pleasure to use with it's high resolution (1440 x 900) and semi-gloss finish.

There is no glass cover so there will be dramatically less reflections compared to the screen of the MBPs

I personally chose the Air over the Pro because of reduced glare.

+ 18 second boot ups and 3 second shut downs. Resumes from sleep within 3 seconds.

+ The two USB 2.0 ports are on opposite sides of the laptop (less clutter than MBP)

+ Speakers are surprisingly loud; they can fill up a small room.

+ Runs extremely cool and it's so quiet that you'll wonder if the fan is running at all.

I can definitely feel heat ~ 87 degrees F on the MPB 13's underside after 6 hours of use

where as the MBA 13's underside stayed relatively cooler.

+ Runs Windows 7 just as cool and quietly. (I installed Windows 7 via flash drive)

+ Performance is almost identical to the MBP 13" 2011 on everyday tasks because the Core i5

CPU can turbo boost to 2.7 GHz and the SSD allows for instant application launching.

+ Gaming: it has the same Intel HD Graphics 3000 as the MBP 13" 2011. I was able to run

Starcraft II smoothly at low settings on native resolution. Medium settings also ran nicely but

you get less FPS during large battles. League of Legends ran smoothly at medium settings

30 FPS flat) on native resolution.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Things I don't like:

*IMPORTANT* Wifi drops have been less frequent in the wake of more updates from Apple.

The keyboard is shallower and has less travel than the MBP keyboards (you'll get used to it

within a few days)

The screen has less color gamut than the MBP 13's screen. This screen covers only 46% of

sRGB color spectrum where as the MBP 13's screen covers 77%. For image editing,

I would use an external monitor.

The vertical viewing angles aren't so great. One minute tilt of the screen causes colors to shift

dramatically (for example: a purple color can change from lavender to light blue as you tilt

the screen backward or forward). Again, I would use an external monitor for tasks in

which accurate colors are mission critical. For everyday use it's not noticeable and is

actually easier on the eyes than the glare-prone screens of the MBPs.

Not all models come with the same SSD. There are 2 variations; a Samsung SSD and a

Toshiba SSD. The Samsung SSD significantly outperforms the Toshiba SSD in

benchmarks (check the AnandTech review)

To check what SSD you have, click on the Apple logo -> About this Mac ->

more info/system report -> then look on the left hand side and click on "SerialATA".

If your SSD's serial number starts with "SM" it's a Samsung and a "TS" means it's a

Toshiba.

I personally get 5 hours of battery life max on a single charge while surfing with 10+ tabs open on safari; I got

~7 hours doing the same tasks on the MPB 13 2011. My activities included watching

YouTube videos, viewing flash content on tech and news sites, reading/writing email,

and using AIM.

No FaceTime HD Camera (720p) as on the MPBs. The quality difference is, unfortunately,

very noticeable.

The integrated microphone is located on the side of the laptop instead of on top of the keyboard

as on the MBP. During Skype calls, my buddies told me that my voice sounded muffled

when using the Air. Using a headset with a mic, I was able to improve the sound quality.

The base of the machine developed a creaking noise within the first week of use. I suspect this to be

caused by uneven tension in the screws.

after 5 months of, a white cluster of stuck pixels developed in the bottom left corner of the screen.

The machine has been handled with care so it's not accidental damage.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion: Which one should you get?

As a college student, I would recommend the Macbook Pro 13". The Air is more than capable of being a primary machine because

of it's superb performance and overall very good screen. For everyday tasks, it should be snappy and an ease to use.

However, students will get a $100 discount on the Pro while the Air only provides a $50 discount. This means that there is a price

difference of $150 for students. The storage space on the Air is imited to 128GB or 256GB while the Pro comes standard with 500GB.

Plus, you can always add a SSD to the Pro later on. The Pro will be the better choice for creative students because it's screen has more color

gamut than the Air's. Lastly, you are getting a full voltage processor which can make a differencein video encoding or other CPU intensive tasks.

If you are not a student:

If you value the extra ports (Ethernet, Firewire, optical drive), a high gamut screen (although more reflective), a 720p webcam

(it's a lot better), and the ability to upgradelater down the line go for the Pro.

If you prioritize portability (light weight), higher screen resolution, fast boot ups/shut downs, and less reflections go for the Air.

In everyday performance the Air feels faster when booting up and launching applications because of its SSD. In CPU intensive tasks,

the Pro will have a slight edge but not much. (the two CPUs are actually pretty neck to neck on GeekBench benchmarks). They both

have the same graphics chip but note that the Pro will get better battery life (1-2 hours more) than the Air because the Pro has a bigger

capacity battery (63.5 watt-hours vs. 50 watt-hours)

Unfortunately, my unit is affected with a wifi drop problem. I don't know if you will encounter the same issue but if you buy an Air from

an Apple Store, make sure to test the wifi out by using it on multiple networks. If you encounter any erratic wifi drops within

the first 14 days demand a refund or an exchange.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Update December 27th, 2011

After installing the 10.7.2 and a firmware update, the wifi connections in my dorm room became more reliable.

However, after taking it home I experienced drops as before on the home network. I DOUBT it's a problem with my

router because ALL other connected devices work fine. The 2011 MBP 13" I previously owned worked flawlessly on my network.

This is most likely a problem with the Air's drivers. 5 months after product launch, I don't believe Apple

has acknowledged the issue or either chose to IGNORE it as other users on the official forums continue to

have similar complaints even to this day.

Hardware wise, the casing held up well except for a scratch on the side. The lid is frighteningly thin and I've read

reports of the screen's fragile nature cracking at the slightest bump by another object. I would handle with care.

Want to know something funny? With the machine off, I can see through the Apple logo on the lid if there's light

behind it it's that thin.

Software wise, sometimes the machine would run hot with fans blazing full throttle when watching HD YouTube videos

and would remain that way even though I close everything. Very odd. A quick reboot solves the problem.

A creaking sound developed within a week of purchase. When I lift the machine up, press on the palm rest or type on it

there would be a creaking noise produced. I suspected the screws of the bottom to be loose so I decided to tighten them.

Note that you'll have to order a pentalobe screwdriver to do this the screws aren't the typical type.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

January 9th, 2011

A cluster of 4-5 stuck pixels developed so I went to get a screen replacement. The Apple genius confirmed it was

4-5 pixels which qualified me for a screen replacement. Service was prompt and I got the machine the next day.

However, the new screen had 2 clearly visible dead pixels in the center of the screen. I tried using it for a few days

but they were an absolute distraction.

Dissatisfied, I took it back to another genius only to be met with rude service. I stated that the dead pixels hindered

functionality as they were visual distractions. He snidely responded with, "Where? I don't even see them" and remained

adamant about not replacing it because I didn't qualify for the "minimum of 5 dead pixels for a replacement" policy.

It was an unpleasant experience to say the least and didn't help.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

March 11th, 2011

I've learned to live with the two dead pixels on the screen and Apple has released an update (10.7.3) to address the

wireless card. I've noticed that with Bluetooth off, the connections are pretty stable around campus and at home.

I've not yet tested this with Bluetooth it makes me curious because people on the official forums report wifi drops when

enabling Bluetooth. Anyway, After 7 months of ownership I would say most of the initial bugs have been remedied and

the Air is a pleasure to use. However, I speculate that the Pro and Air lineup will be updated to Ivy Bridge in the summer

(along with the rumored redesign of the Pros). Buy now if you need it but if you can waiting might be better.

Cheers!

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Zoom R8 R 8 Track Multi-Channel Digital Studio Recorder

Zoom R8 R 8 Track Multi-Channel Digital Studio Recorder
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
Buy Now
It had a very nice condenser mic and I don't feel I need an external one.

Also drum machine has a lot of patterns which I liked a lot.

In addition, it has a tuner and it can be used as an audio interface between your laptop and your instrument and voice.

This is all-in-one machine.

If you don't need 8 channels of simultaneous recording this is a perfect machine!! (this can do 2 channels of simultaneous recording)

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Sealife DC1400 Pro Digital Underwater Camera Set SL725

Sealife DC1400 Pro Digital Underwater Camera Set SL725
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
List Price: $829.95
Sale Price: $499.00
Today's Bonus: 40% Off
Buy Now

I purchased the DC1400 a few months ago for our trip to Grand Cayman, with the intention of trying it out before I went diving. Well that didn't happen. I basically took the camera out and just used it, only reading the instruction manual. The camera takes awesome photos. I did over expose some of the photos because of having the strobe on "A". Once I dialed it down to the 1-2 setting it worked great. I also used the video feature and it worked great. I would recommend this product to anyone who scuba dives. The camera (without strobe) worked well for snorkeling.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Canon EOS 1D Mark IV 16.1 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-Inch

Canon EOS 1D Mark IV 16.1 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-Inch LCD and 1080p HD Video
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
Buy Now
I had the Mark IV on order with Amazon since Canon's product announcement on October 20th of 2009. Since my local camera shop received the unit on Monday January 4, 2010 and Amazon still listed it as "Not Yet Received" I purchased mine from the local retailer despite the additional $464 in sales tax.

I have been a Mark III shooter since June of 2007. For my professional work, my primary subject matter is live theatrical performance which includes acting as well as dancing ranging from ballet to traditional Tango to the very fast paced ballroom, specifically shooting Burn the Floor, which is just completing their Broadway run this month. Live performance shooting has many of the same elements of sports photography, except the lighting is much lower and at times more severe due to stage lighting. My Mark III performed well in most instances although I did have occasions where the autofocus did not perform as well as I had hoped. But to be fair, I cannot say with 100% certainty that it was the fault of the gear or the user, me.

For my non professional work I utilized the Mark III for extensive street shooting in the rain, high wind and many other adverse conditions. In all cases the camera performed well enough that I could only blame myself in those instances where I didn't get the shot. This includes night shooting of high movement subject matter.

I have never been concerned about the 10.1 MP size of the Mark III having had many of my images blown up to 6x8 feet posters used on the outside of theatres and large shots used in four color programs. I had several concerns with the Mark III which I had hoped would be addressed in its successor, the Mark IV:

1. A higher ISO range with equal or less noise

2. The ability for the focus point to switch when changing from landscape to portrait orientation. Although the Custom Function allows one to change the rear wheel to adjust the focus point, I prefer to use that dial to adjust for exposure. Having to switch in a very fast paced situation caused me to miss some great shots.

3. More selection of focus points for manual focus point adjustment

Other than those three wishes, I was happy with my Mark III. In all three cases, the Mark IV met my wishes. I have done a comparison in low light, low contrast situations with both Marks at ISO 6400, which for the Mark III was considered H1. As such, adjusting the ISO from 3200 to 6400 was not possible in 1/3 stop increments. More on that later. In the comparison, the Mark IV handily beats the Mark III in terms of detail and noise at ISO 6400. Much more detail is visible which has something to do with a higher MP count, but at 100% crops, there is a marked difference. The noise on the Mark IV is less and of a different quality than the Mark III, more film like than digital.

During performances I had only used ISO 6400 in conditions which made lower settings impossible. I have always thought that a noisy shot is much better than one that is blurred beyond usage. My clients agree. One of my favorite lenses to use while shooting on stage as well as from the house is the EF 24-105mm f4.0 IS L. The focal range on a 1.3 crop sensor is just PERFECT, but the slowness of the f4.0 kept me from utilizing that lens with the Mark III unless lighting was sufficient. This will all change with the Mark IV as ISO 6400 is just fine using a f4.0 lens in my conditions.

Keep in mind that everyone needs to decide how a camera is to be used, under what conditions and it is naive to think that an investment in current glass won't influence a decision to stay or leave any brand of camera. I am heavily invested in Canon glass and all of them are L series lenses. I find that the color and sharpness of L series lenses are worth the investment, especially since I purchase most of them on the used market. There are folks who love to go back and forth on brand, pixel snooping, stats, etc. in hopes of proving themselves 'right.' I am NOT one of those people. To me a mediocre/poor/boring image is the same whether you take it with film, a full frame DSLR or medium format camera. (BTW, I'm not sure why 35mm is considered FF anyway. I consider 2.25x2.25 my idea of full frame!) My personal opinion is those who often argue ad naseum about camera stats take the lousy or boring pictures anyway.

I have NOT been able to use the camera in high movement, low light performance photography as I write this. My first opportunity for that comes this weekend. It will also be the first time I have the chance to shoot with two separate cameras with different lenses attached. That will give me a good, but not scientific comparison of the cameras, but more important for me is whether keeping both is worth the effort. I will decide if the Mark III gets a new home or not.

My advice is to base your hard earned purchasing dollars on what is right for your situation. My Mark III has performed well in the past and I'm confident after some of my own testing that the Mark IV is even better. Time will tell and as I gain more experience shooting with this new tool, I may add my insights here in the future. Best of luck with your own shooting!

UPDATE January 9 2010

Today I had my first opportunity to shoot in low light with the Mark IV. Although it was NOT as high movement/low light as I am accustomed, it was a very good initial test. I shot a choral group with musicians, so movement was nice and slow, except for the conductor. It was also the first time I was able to use two camera bodies without switching lenses. On the Mark III, I used a EF 70-200mm f2.8 L IS and on the Mark IV, I utilized the EF 24-105 f4.0 L IS. This focal range allowed me to cover all that was necessary. Obviously I used the f4.0 on the Mark IV because of its higher ISO range and noise performance.

I want to say that it will take some adjustments moving to the Mark IV. As I reviewed some images from other photographers using the Mark IV prior to receiving my own camera I had no idea what conditions the photographer's lighting conditions presented. I can say that because of the new sensor and ISO performance, it makes scenes appear MUCH more well lit than I experience with my human eye. In the past I have run -1/3 to -2/3 EV when using my Mark III to prevent blow out in highlights even using Highlight Tone Priority. Tonight I set both cameras on 0 EV to compare. The Mark IV presents a brighter image, about 1/3 stop brighter than the Mark III.

Because this was not a paid gig, I took more chances with the imagery than had it been for pay. I found that in camera Noise reduction of 1 Low suits my taste much better than -0 Standard in the Custom Settings function. There is a different quality to the noise produced at Standard over Low. I prefer Canon's Low setting, but your preference may differ. The highest I found it necessary to set the ISO tonight was at 10,000. Upon examining the images on my monitor, there is the most noise in the subtle shadow areas around the subject's chin and lower neck. This is normal in my experience along with noise in large solid color backgrounds. But the noise at 10,000 is easily much better than the Mark III at ISO 6400. In addition the detail that remains at 10,000 eclipses the detail, or lack of detail in the Mark III at 6400. I measure my detail in the hairline wrinkles around the eyes and in the forehead of my subjects. The Mark IV sustained those details where the Mark III at 2/3 stops lower ISO did not.

Also the noise produced by the Mark IV is more chroma than luminance. In my workflow, chroma noise is MUCH easier to reduce than luminance noise. The dynamic range of the Mark IV in terms of color is FAR superior to the Mark III, but I attribute this to a new sensor and new processors. Camera bodies are really just like computers, as soon as they come out they immediately begin to become obsolete. The color and white balance are MUCH better than my Mark III. It still takes some adjustment, but much less than the III.

The automatic focus point association between landscape and portrait is a God send! Also the Mark IV takes advantage of UDMA card speed. I purchased a 32gb Sandisk Extreme CF card for the Mark IV and it's rated at 60mb per second. In shooting RAW burst, the ability of the Mark IV to write to the card after the buffer is full is easily three times as fast as the Mark III, but to be fair the III doesn't have UDMA capability.

So far so good. I plan to keep my Mark III simply because shooting with two cameras with different focal length lenses is the only way to go for my work. At some point I will replace the Mark III with another IV, but that will take time and a few more clients. It will be interesting to see how the images look at high ISO in large format, which much of my work is used as with clients. I'm happy with my choice so far and anticipate that more work in my normal venues will continue to show favorable results.

My issue is now how to build up my neck to support two 1D bodies with a 70-200 on one and a 24-105 on the other! When I use my 28-70 in place of the 24-105 it's going to be a real pain!

FINAL UPDATE: January 17 2010

Tonight I had my first opportunity to shoot a theatrical performance with the IV. I can only say that Auto ISO along with AI Servo will change how I shoot theatre. The settings I used tonight were Highlight Priority On, AI Servo, single shot, Auto ISO, ISO range L to 12800. The lenses I used tonight were the EF 24-105 f4 L IS and the EF 70-200 f2.8 L IS. Anticipation is such a major part of theatrical shooting, waiting for just the right expression, gesture and moment. I was able to capture images tonight with a clarity that I have not experienced with my Mark III. Auto ISO constrained within the parameters I wanted left me free to concentrate entirely on capturing the moment while retaining a speed proportionate to the focal length. By freeing me up from keeping an eye on the shutter speed, which was set by the Auto ISO, I was able to compose my shots more accurately. Using AI Servo for my focusing also allowed me to follow the subject and keep them in focus just before pressing the shutter. I watched and anticipated their expressions like never before.

The ISO varied between a low of 800 in very good stage lighting to a high of 12800 in those scenes where it was too dark for me to know the actor's expression. I ran an EV value between -.33 to -1.0 to compensate for harsh spot lighting, so common in stage work. In those cases where the shot was very dark, where the actor's face was shaded in a very dark manner, ISO 12800's noise is very visible, but not to the point where a noise processor will bring the image back to usefulness. In those cases where light is medium, I will NOT have to use noise reduction post processing for printed images in large format.

So with my last entry I will simply say that I am pleased to have made an investment in the new Mark IV. It surpasses my Mark III in a way that will now allow me to press the limits of my ability to capture even more compelling imagery. And in my work, an image that moves the viewer is one I'm proud to produce, regardless of the equipment. The Mark IV will certainly push my own skill limits in a way I'm happy to undertake. It's a tool that will help expand the level of my own creative process.

Best of luck to all of you in whatever you decide to purchase and shoot. It's time for me to get back to work.

UPDATE February 28 2010

I'm not sure how many of you who own the Mark IV have upgraded your firmware to 1.0.6, but if you haven't, I would recommend the update. Although Canon has not released specifics about the update I can tell you that from personal experience, it helps to track objects that pause for 1-2 seconds before moving. Prior to the update I noticed that when a performer paused, the AI Servo mode hunted a bit attempting to stay on the same trajectory as the subject's last known movement. With 1.0.6, that pause causes the camera to hunt much less than before. I have now had the chance to use the Mark IV in two live theatrical performances, one publicity shoot, low light street shooting and one wedding. (My gawd I hate it when I get coerced into shooting the occasional wedding, but when my regular clients 'ask' what is a guy to do?) and the image quality along with high ISO performance is remarkable. In real world applications ISO up to 10000 is very usable for print in large format.

In addition, having studied Canon's guide for AI Servo and High ISO usage is necessary in order to customize the camera for specific applications. I highly recommend reviewing the material. You can download the PDF from Canon Rumors at this link:

You'll have to scroll down a bit for the link to the PDF.

UPDATE May 4 2010 Noise performance with Adobe Photoshop CS5

Having used this rig for quite some time now in various low light/high movement situations I wanted to comment that I have avoided the use of the higher range of ISO, specifically H1, 2 and 3. In those cases where I wished to reduce the noise levels in post processing taken at ISO 12800 I had used Noise Ninja with good results. I recently purchased Adobe's new Photoshop CS5 and decided to process some images taken at H1 and H2 through their Camera RAW noise reduction scheme.

Obviously the quality of light has a large bearing on the amount of noise in any high ISO image. But I can say that using the new Camera RAW noise reduction in CS5 now allows me to use both H1 and H2 ISO on many more 'non emergency' situations. In the past Noise Ninja did not yield acceptable results at H1 or 2, blurring the detail beyond my acceptance level. CS5 removes that obstacle and I now find that shots taken at H1 (ISO 25600) are VERY useful both in print and on the web. H2 at 51200 are also useful when run through the noise reduction program. Yes, there is noise and if one is expecting a very low level of noise I would recommend you NOT venture into those ranges. But if like me you are sometimes REQUIRED to get a shot that captures the moment in more than acceptable fashion, I highly recommend the use of CS5's Camera RAW noise reduction with the Mark IV. It is a combination that has allowed me to capture and produce imagery like never before.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

SanDisk Micro Secure Digital 2 GB Memory Card (SDSDQ-2048-A10M)

SanDisk Micro Secure Digital 2 GB Memory Card Retail Package
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
Dropped it into my Garmin 60CSX GPS unit and it worked without a hitch. If you've got one of these GPS units, buy it and you will find it should be compatible.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

JVC Adixxion 2 - GC-XA2 One Color, One Size

JVC Adixxion 2 - GC-XA2 One Color, One Size
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
List Price: $299.95
Sale Price: $299.00
Today's Bonus: $0.95 Off
Buy Now

This camera has excellent video quality when recording at 1080p60. Any setting under this is pretty underwhelming. Good thing it can handle 1080p60 like a champ, right? Wrong. This camera will overheat if you record longer than 20-30 minutes, even if you set the LCD to turn off while recording. I did not experience this issue when recording in slow motion (720p120,) but the video quality was very poor. The bitrate was low and the video was grainy--barely usable. I was expecting the same 720p quality, simply at 120 frames per second. Clearly the processor cannot handle this, so video quality suffers.

When I experienced the overheating, one of two things would happen. 1) The camera would not indicate any problem whatsoever, and when you reviewed the footage later, you would find artifacts and major discoloration, (like a purple filter was applied.) 2) The camera would shut off without warning. If you leave the screen on while recording, you will see a warning about overheating. In my tests, I was using 1080p60, with or without the LCD on, and the camera mounted to a suction cup/arm from my car's windshield. I got the arm so the camera could sit back from the glass, and in the shade of my vehicle to prevent overheating. The device was not in direct sunlight. My A/C was set very comfortably as well. The camera was clearly overheating from the processor handling 1080p60 recording--not due to the environment.

I did get a chance to take the camera to the lake, and it performed admirably. Being quad-proof right out of the box without needing a case is pretty awesome. I did notice that when you got water in the microphone/speaker holes that recording and playback were affected until that water was removed. To help with this, I tended to use the camera upside-down, so the LCD was facing me in my right hand. The water would drain out faster. Video quality is great--I have no complaints there. I do wonder how long the camera will handle water, given the design. You are depending on a seal in the battery cover to protect everything. Eventually, this will fail, due to the way the cover slides into place and the nature of wearing on the rubber itself.

I returned the camera due to the overheating problems. In the manual, it states that the camera should be able to last about an hour of continuous recording at the 1080p60 setting. This seems fairly accurate, and I would also interpret that to mean the camera is capable of recording continuously without overheating. This is not the case, as I had the unit swapped out twice and all of the cameras had the same issue. If you are looking for a camera to take quick snippits of video, this JVC is hard to beat. If you need something that's going to last longer than 20 minutes of trail riding, racing, or whatever other activity you are doing, you need to look elsewhere. I purchased this camera in lieu of the Hero3 Black Edition due to many online reviews complaining of that unit being prone to overheating as well. This may be a common problems in this type of camera, but that doesn't excuse the defect. I want the highest quality available so that I have more to work with when I get back to the cutting room.

Personally, I am now waiting for the HDR-AS30V, which is being released at the end of September.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Olympus 261001-14-54 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 Zuiko ED Digital SLR Lens

Olympus 261001-14-54 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 Zuiko ED Digital SLR Lens for E1, E300 and E500 Cameras
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
I have an Olympus E-520 bought together with the two kit lenses -14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 & 40-150mm f/4.0-5.6. After using them for a while, I decided I wanted a faster base zoom lens for low-light, non-flash conditions. I chose the Olympus Zuiko 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 lens. When it arrived last week, I spent a day taking comparison shots with the 14-42mm kit lens. The camera was used in Aperture-Priority mode to allow comparable settings. Image stabilization was always on. Following are my results.

Image Quality and Performance

I found hardly any difference in image quality (color balance, contrast, sharpness, CA, etc.) between the two lenses at the same aperture, focal length, and ISO settings. At identical settings, images using the 14-54mm might have been marginally sharper, but not enough to notice except in big-time crops. However, the lens was 2-3 times faster; i.e. at the same ISO and aperture, a shot taken at 1/30 of a second with the 14-42mm lens could be taken at 1/80 using the 14-54mm. Likewise, at the same shutter speed and aperture, an ISO 400 shot could be taken at ISO 200. A lower ISO and/or a higher shutter speed CAN increase image quality, since there's less sensor noise & less chance for camera shake, respectively. With the differing settings needed for decent exposures in low-light conditions, images and crops using the 14-54mm lens were distinctly better. Also better bokeh.

I found focusing speed and accuracy about same between the two lenses for both far-away and close-up exposures except in low-light conditions, where the 14-54mm had a definite advantage. For far-away photos, the 14-54mm has about 20% greater maximum telephoto reach, roughly 2.1X versus 1.7X. For close-ups, the 14-54mm had an almost-macro capability it focused about two times nearer to the subject.

Using the on-board flash with both lenses at their widest apertures, the 14-54mm took decent exposures at ISO 100, while the 14-42mm required at least ISO 200. The longer barrel of the 14-54mm cast a flash-shadow at its widest 14mm focal length (28mm film equivalent). The shadow disappeared at about 19mm (38mm film equivalent). No flash-shadow was cast with the 14-42mm lens at any focal length.

Size and Portability

Weighing just over one pound, the 14-54mm is over two times heavier than the 7 ounce 14-42mm lens. It's also about 40% longer and a bit wider 3.4" vs. 2.4" and 2.9" vs. 2.6", respectively. Its larger size does affect my system portability. I carry my stuff in a compact Olympus #260248 camera bag. The bag accommodates the E-520 with the 14-42mm kit lens attached, the 40-150mm lens, a Sony 1.7X Tele-conversion lens, an extra battery, the charger, a short extendable monopod, an extra CF card, a lens brush and cleaning cloth, and a small notebook. While a tight fit, everything's accessibly together at a total weight of just over 4-1/2 pounds. If I attach the 14-54mm lens, some of that "stuff" won't fit -its greater size and weight is the reason I've given it only a 4-Star rating. A bigger bag would fix that, but I really like the size and quality of the one I have now.

Cost Ranges

As current ballpark figures that I'm sure will change over time, a new 14-42mm lens-alone costs just over $200; a new 14-54mm lens-alone is just over $400, or about twice the cost. Olympus's new Version II 14-54mm lens is closer to $600 but that's a separate story. However . . . . if bought new as part of an Olympus E-Series camera package, the two "kit lenses" add about $200 to the camera body-only cost -that's about $100 each, which is roughly what they sell for used. Likewise, a lightly used or factory-reconditioned 14-54mm lens can be had in the mid-to-high $300's range a lower percent savings, but still decent. The Version II 14-54mm lens can be bought new as a package with higher-level Olympus bodies like the E-30, but I've not done a lens-alone comparison, nor have I seen any used Version II lenses. Whew . . . . a confusing set of numbers and options!

Bottom Line

If you take all or most of your photos outside on sunny days, I see absolutely no reason to upgrade from the 14-42 mm kit lens to the 14-54mm lens. Image quality is essentially the same, as is focusing speed and accuracy. Additionally, the latter's larger size and weight can make portability more difficult, and its cost is two to four times greater than the kit lens depending on how you choose to compare and buy.

HOWEVER, if you want higher quality images of landscapes on dark days, of building interiors, or of weddings and similar events where a flash can be disturbing, then the 14-54mm lens could well be a necessity! And it's about the lightest, smallest and least expensive lens you can get with similar specifications. Finally, its more robust build quality, and slightly better telephoto and close-up capabilities might be pluses, but they don't seem as significant as its better low-light performance.

Am I satisfied with my upgrade? Not entirely sure yet. I'd intended to sell my 14-42mm kit lens on receipt of the 14-54mm. After my comparison test, that intention changed. Most of the time, my bag will be packed with the kit lens and other "stuff" as described earlier. I'm glad to have the option for better low-light flexibility, but the 14-42mm is good enough to stay for now as my usually attached walk-around lens for bright-day photography.

P.S. Off-topic, I occasionally use a Sony VLC-DH1758 Tele-conversion lens to increase the reach of my 40-150mm lens by a factor of 1.7. It was an accidentally discovered way to almost double the range of the lens -and the Sony fits nicely in my bag. If you're curious, search Amazon for that item, and see an early August 2009 review under the listing.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Sony NEX-5TL/B NEX5TL NEX5T NEX5 Compact Interchangeable Lens

Sony NEX-5TL/B NEX5TL NEX5T NEX5 Compact Interchangeable Lens Digital Camera with 16-50mm Power Zoom Lens ULTIMATE BUNDLE with 32GB High Speed Card, Spare Battery, Deluxe Filter Kit, Mini HDMI cable, SD card reader, Padded case + More!
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
List Price: $749.99
Sale Price: $639.00
Today's Bonus: 15% Off
Buy Now

Very impressed with the quality, features, etc.

You won't be disappointed! Buy a tripod and some other accessories and you will be almost a pro ;)

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Onkyo HT-S5600 7.1-Channel Home Theater Receiver/Speaker Package

Onkyo HT-S5600 7.1-Channel Home Theater Receiver/Speaker Package
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
List Price: $599.00
Sale Price: $579.00
Today's Bonus: 3% Off
Buy Now

I love Onkyo products (this is my second home theater in a box I have owned from Onkyo) but they have a quality control issue that they don't appear to be addressing properly. The subwoofer on this system started cutting out and then ultimately stopped working about 20 minutes after setup. I thought it was a settings issue or power issue at first but I tested the RCA cable that supplies the signal from the receiver to the subwoofer with a multimeter and discovered it had little to no continuity. That is, the cable had a break in the wiring internally even though I did nothing but unfurl the wire and connect it. A new RCA cable fixed the issue.

Out of curiosity, I conducted an online search and there are scores of people who are having subwoofer issues with similar Onkyo systems. Most of these consumers are under the assumption that their subwoofer is to blame, when in reality, it's probably just the wiring. I submitted a polite email to the company about a month ago and have yet to hear anything back.

Do yourself a favor: If you are buying an Onkyo system, add a good 15-20 ft RCA cable and a 100' spool of some decent -16 gauge speaker wire to your cart. The wiring that comes with Onkyo home theater systems is cheap, thin, and obviously of poor quality.

Another small thing that Onkyo has been doing for years that I do not like is the speaker connections on the back of the receiver. Unless you spend another $30 on banana connectors, the connections are awkward and difficult to secure.

Aside from that, the system sounds great and is fairly intuitive to use. I purchased the UBT-1 Bluetooth adapter which was a nice addition to the system. It would be nice if they created a home theater in a box package using the completely wireless TX-NR626 receiver.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Panasonic 8mm f/3.5 ED Fisheye Lens for Lumix G Micro Four

Panasonic 8mm f/3.5 ED Fisheye Lens for Lumix G Micro Four Thirds  Digital Cameras
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
List Price: $799.95
Sale Price: $639.95
Today's Bonus: 20% Off
Buy Now

This is a great lens but also a niche lens. The construction on this lens is first rate. It is a lot like the Panasonic 7-14mm f/4.0 Micro Four Thirds Lens for Panasonic Digital SLR Cameras. The lens is extremely small and light for a fisheye lens. Panasonic claims it is the smallest in the world.

This lens is really good for an incredibly wide field of view and for the neat distorted look that gives the lens it name-fish eye.

There are 3 types of wide angle lenses:

Panasonic Ultra Wide Angle Rectilinear 7-14mm114 deg

Panasonic Diagonal Fisheye 8mm -180 deg

Circular Fisheye 180 deg

The Rectilinear lens while still having some barrel distortion, basically tries to remove it as much as possible to portray the image in a square or true to life fashion. However, by removing the distortion, the field of view is decreased. As listed above the Panasonic 7mm lens gives 114 deg field of view.

The 8mm `diagonal' fisheye give a 180 deg field of view despite being 1mm longer. It does this by allowing for massive barrel distortion. Basically, the only straight lines that will be straight pass through the center of the lens. The `diagonal' fisheye utilizes the entire rectangle of the frame. Whereas, the `circular' fisheye has a circle picture with the corners being black from being completely underexposed. This Panasonic 8mm is a `diagonal' fisheye which I personally prefer.

The reason this is a niche lens is that while the effect is cool, it will start to get old very quickly if used over and over again. It would be nice for shooting weddings but only for 2 or 3 photos. The same thing would go for birthday parties or sporting events.

For video the same thing goes. You could use it for a few segments in a clip but if you tried to shoot a whole video, even 3 min video, people would become fatigued and bored by it very quickly.

So, while, this lens has fantastic construction and great optics and would be a good quiver in many a toolkit, it should not be one of the first lenses you buy. Given the choice between this or the 7-14mm, the 7-14mm is going to be the better choice most of the time. If you are looking for a fisheye to expand your capabilities and you want the smallest with great optics this is the lens for you.

Pros

1) Great construction -Plastic but sturdy

2) Incredibly small and light (< 6 oz !)

3) Great optics

Cons

1) Only 7 bladed aperture instead of 9 -Not a big deal because an 8mm fisheye will have almost nothing out of focus. Still for this price 9 blades would be better.

2) Niche lens

3) Panasonic wasted time and money on this when they could have made 25mm f/1.4 or the even more needed the 300mm f/2.8

Update 24 Oct 2010

I've been shooting this fisheye extensively for the past week on a trip to Egypt. I carried a G1 and GH1 and the two lenses that stayed on my camera were the 14-140. and the 8mm. This is a great travel lens. There is no doubt about it. When touring around there is always a need for a super wide lens. The cool thing with a fisheye is that you get 180 deg. Yes you get distortion but as you can see on my photos sometimes that is good. The other thing to note is that the distortion can be fixed in post. While you do lose some of the photo when you do this you don't lose as much as if you were shooting a rectilinear lens. So for an update on this I would make the following recommendations concerning this or the 7-14mm.

If you are a working professional or semi-pro then you will most likely need both. However, if you can only have one then the 7-14mm would be first followed by the 8mm.

If you are a hobbyist then I would recommend the 8mm first. You can fix the distortion in post. It is ~.5 stops faster and it is incredibly useful for all sorts of travel and everyday photography.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>