Showing posts with label good digital camera deals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label good digital camera deals. Show all posts

Sony BDP-S1100 Blu-ray Disc Player

Sony BDP-S1100 Blu-ray Disc Player
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
Buy Now
The Sony BDP-S1100 is the best non-3D Blu-ray/DVD player that I have seen, anywhere near its price range. It takes 15 seconds to load Blu-ray disks, which took around 2 minutes to load in one of my earlier Panasonic players. A couple of Blu-ray disks (The King's Speech and Casino) would only load in this Panasonic player if I unplugged the Internet connection. Eventually, a firmware update came along which allowed loading of these titles, but they still loaded very slowly.

The owner's manual that came with the BDP-S1100 lists two Sony models in its title: BDP-S1100/BX110. However, the two models appear to be identical other than their different nomenclature. According to the owner's manual, the only difference between these two models is that the BX110 comes with a "High Speed HDMI Cable."

The Sony BDP-S1100/BX110 is not WiFi capable, nor is it WiFi ready. The only way to connect this player to the Internet is through the use of a LAN cable. When using a LAN cable, this player connects to the Internet quickly and produces fast and accurate streaming content. With Comcast Internet, the player quickly set itself up through the use of its Auto settings.

My previous experience with all-in-one Blu-ray players has found their Internet streaming capabilities lacking. This was not a problem for me because I have a Roku 2 XS for my Netflix and Amazon streaming videos. I assumed that this Sony player would be no exception and that its Internet streaming capabilities would not be good. But I registered the player with Netflix and Amazon just to see if it would actually play streaming video with any degree of accuracy. (By the way, the player has the ability to erase all personal data from its internal memory should ownership of the player ever be transferred.)

To my surprise, this player does an excellent job of streaming both Netflix and Amazon content. No dropouts, no stuttering and no lockups. The Sony streaming video interfaces are slightly different from those of the Roku, but they are very intuitive and easily learned. I couldn't be happier with the performance of this Sony player's streaming video performance.

This Sony player quickly loads both Blu-ray and DVD disks and when the Auto function is used, it plays both Blu-ray and DVD disks in 24p mode. The remote control system is very sensitive and the player responds quickly and accurately to all commands. The player allows faster loading of Blu-ray disks by allowing the BD Internet Connection to be shut off. I have shut off this feature because I have found nearly all BD Internet content to be a complete waste of time. There is also an optional Quick Start Mode which allows Blu-ray disks to load faster.

One of the audio settings of the Sony player was somewhat confusing to me until I did some research. The BD Audio MIX Setting when set to On produces a multi-channel PCM signal only, presumably adding alternate soundtrack information to the main audio program. When this option is set to Off, the primary soundtrack comprised of various audio types, such as Dolby Digital Plus, DTS HD and True HD are available. I set this option to Off.

A USB input on the front of the player allows the playback of MP4, MP3, WMV, JPG pictures etc., (those are the only formats that I have tried so far) and the USB device is also used to store BD data in a "buda" file, which the player can delete on demand.

My Pioneer receiver has the ability to correct lip sync problems through the use of an audio delay setting. The Sony player did not need any audio sync correction and the HDMI audio signal arrived at the receiver perfectly synchronized with the video. At least that's my assumption, because the Sony player, Samsung TV and Pioneer receiver may all be working seamlessly together. There could still be lip sync problems with other combinations of playback equipment. However, the player also has the ability to do an Audio/Video sync from 0 to 120 msec and the default setting is 0 msec.

Notes:

There is a coaxial digital audio output jack in the back of the unit -a feature that is becoming rare in entry-level Blu-ray players. I did not check the digital audio output for possible lip sync issues.

Once the Internet connection was established, the player offered to update its software version to M14.R.0093 and this update was accomplished quickly.

The player generates almost no heat and therefore does not have a cooling fan.

This Sony player has a light that indicates that the player is turned on, but it does not display any disk time or chapter information on the unit. This disk information can be displayed on screen by pressing the "DISPLAY" button on the remote while the disk is playing.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Camera Lens

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Camera Lens
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
List Price: $125.00
Sale Price: $110.00
Today's Bonus: 12% Off
Buy Now

Once upon a time the 50 mm lens was THE standard camera lens and was THE optical benchmark by which manufacturers were judged and compared. Although the basic lens focus has now shifted (at least at the low to mid amateur level) to zooms you can still benefit from years of research and development that went into designing the 50 mm lens and this here lens may be the best lens, dollar for dollar, that you can ever buy. The question is can you afford not to own this lens?

Years of development have brought us a lens that has a fast aperture of 1.8 far faster than any consumer zoom lens and that is sharp as a filed tack. Be forewarned about the sharpness . . . if you are taking pictures of people, this lens is unyielding in its sharpness and may well surprise you and your subjects whose every blemish is captured. The lens has a fabulously shallow depth of field if you want to use the 1.8 aperture to blow out a background. This lens is also ridiculously inexpensive. It is not USM so it is a little loud. It does not have a moving focus scale. For the money though this is heaven.

As to the build quality yes, it is plastic. No, it's not built like the Rock of Gibraltar. If you are going to give this lens extensive use as your everyday lens and you shoot a lot, it may not hold up all that well as one reviewer suggests. However, I've now had this lens and used it fairly regularly (although not as the primary lens) for about 8 years and it is still in great condition. In my mind, spend the $$ on this first before you go and drop $330 on the 50mm 1.4 USM lens and I think you'll find it gets the job done nicely and that the extra $250 on the 1.4 may not be worth the difference in build (major difference), speed (minor difference) and image quality (minor difference).

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

ContourROAM Waterproof HD 1080P Hands-free HD Camcorder

ContourROAM Waterproof HD 1080P Hands-free HD Camcorder Watersport Kit
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
List Price: $249.99
Sale Price: $129.00
Today's Bonus: 48% Off
Buy Now

This is a good camera for the price I paid, I got it on sale and so far I am pleased with the camera's performance. I would have given a five star rating if the camera came with better instructions. The printed material that came with the camera is sparse at best although the camera is easy to operate I had to learn some things the hard way. For example, I purchased a helmet mount bracket for mountain biking. The camera slides into the bracket via the grooves along either side of the camera (so the camera is lying on its side.)

Going for my first ride the camera worked very well however the film was sideways and I was unable to rotate the movie and ended up deleting it. The camera has a lens that rotates but there were no instructions regarding this feature and how to use it. On my next ride I rotated the lens and my film came out very nice.

Another example of poor instruction is the use of the waterproof case. Although the case works very well I had a difficult time mounting the camera and case to my helmet mount. After much consternation I finally located the small black plastic lock tabs that were preventing mounting. Had there been adequate instruction I would have been much happier.

In the minimal instructions provided there is information about downloading Storyteller" a program for uploading video etc. Storyteller takes a lot of time to upload your video. Additionally, in Storyteller is where you can make adjustments to your camera such as 720, 960 or 1080 filming and sound sensitivity. There was no information provided with the camera that explained this feature in Storyteller, I found it by looking around within the download. Camera does not come with any SD card, you need a micro SD card, shop around I found a micro SDHC (High Capacity) chip at a big box store that was 32GB for $24.99.

Otherwise I am delighted at the performance of the camera the waterproof case was put to the test in recent heavy rain and rough trail uses. The only drawback for the waterproof case is that it dampens the sound pick-up. The camera comes set with a 720 HD default and the pictures are very good. The 720 setting provides the longest film time and least battery depletion. The 720 is so good I do not have a need for anything higher for the way I use the camera. The only other issue I have found is that there is considerable sound distortion in high winds or at high speeds (high wind). I realize this is an issue with all cameras I have encountered especially in outdoor sporting activities.

My first trail ride was 46 minutes and the camera battery was fine for the entire time. I charged the battery after that ride and it took only about a half an hour. The camera charges via a USB plug. I recommend the camera if you can catch it on sale, the instruction provided is lacking but the camera appears sturdy, well-built and delivers very good video. The helmet mount is an extra that costs about 15 dollars.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

OEM Replacement DVD 7" Touchscreen GPS Navigation Unit

OEM Replacement DVD 7' Touchscreen GPS Navigation Unit For Chevrolet Chevy With OnStar Supported,XM,Radio,iPod Interface,Bluetooth Hands Free,USB, AUX Input,US & Canada Map,Plug & Play Installation
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
List Price: $1,999.00
Sale Price: Price Unavailable
Today's Bonus: 70% Off
Buy Now

I installed this into a 2013 Tahoe and all stock features worked as advertised, using provided cabling. Looks seamlessly stock, but has better features than Stock GM Navigation system. I had to splice into my factory rear camera at the rear-view mirror connector (Pins 6-white and 7-Blue) to use the Head Unit's RCA REAR-VIEW camera connection. You can also purchase a USB adapter to connect the New Navigation USB to the Truck USB cable for $3 on Amazon which will allow the USB connection in the console to communicate to your new Navigation unit for playing video/audio media. Maps were updated through May-2012 and can be updated through a micro-SD slot in the front. The menus are very simple to use and response between all Input/Outputs Navigation/XM-radio/DVD/Aux is extremely fast. I would highly recommend this system to anyone not wanted to shell out what the dealer is wanting you to pay for the GM Navigation System.

Update to others: The Unit comes very with little instructions, but there is a Forum at Simplesoft that will answer most installation related questions, as well as the owners manual for download. This Unit is known as the 80xx-II Model. xx in the model# determines what car it is fit for, but the software is the same for all. Simplesoft's forum link [Google search will find it by searching "Simplesoft Navigation"

Tips:

This $2 adaptor will allow you to connect the Nav's USB cable to the factory GM cable, so that the console USB port will connect to the Nav unit for playing your music in the DVD/USB mode. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002FCDRR4/ref=oh_details_o04_s00_i00

The cabling harness comes with 2 pairs of RCA connections which need to be connected together for the XM radio to have sound. There are several RCA cables, but look for the ones with XM on them.

If you have factory Bluetooth, I wouldn't bother with the Bluetooth offered with this Nav Unit. If you don't have Bluetooth, the Nav unit comes with the Mic that you can install to take advantage of the Bluetooth function.

Maps can be updated through Naviextras.com for about $70(This Nav Unit is listed on Naviextras as (Flyaudio USA 80-II). You would need to download the Naviextras Toolbox software, then it should recognize the Nav's MicroSD card on your PC....same as any other mobil navigation device. The MicroSD for the Navigation is location on the front panel of the Nav Unit.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

SIRUI T-1205X 5-Section Carbon Fiber Tripod

SIRUI T-1205X 5-Section Carbon Fiber Tripod
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
List Price: $374.95
Sale Price: $280.95
Today's Bonus: 25% Off
Buy Now

This is the smallest tripod I've seen that is solid enough to actually use in the field, in my opinion. It folds very small and will fit in most daypacks. Of course, it doesn't bring the camera to eye-level for a 6 footer like me, but it does an adequate job of holding the camera still. It is well made and I've not had any mechanical problems with it.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Rokinon 800mm Multi-Coated Mirror Lens with 2x Teleconverter

Rokinon 800mm Multi-Coated Mirror Lens with 2x Teleconverter for Nikon D3100, D3200, D5100, D7000, D700, D800, D4 Digital SLR Cameras
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
Buy Now
Let's get 1 thing clear. It's a piece of junk compared to Canon lenses. It's blurry at 800mm & extremely blurry at 1600mm. It's 18oz with teleconverter & EF adaptor.

The answer is no. The 2x teleconverter doesn't buy any more resolution. The fact that the 2x teleconverter has no front lens cap shows how valuable its manufacturer thinks it is.

What the 2x teleconverter buys U is sharper focusing. If your goal is focusing bright objects, use the 2x teleconverter & throw away 1/2 the frame to get better focus. It's much easier to focus this way.

It's probably no better than a 400mm L & it's probably no better than a 200mm L + 2x teleconverter for $200 in 2007. Unfortunately the Canon 2x teleconverter jumped 50% since then. It's definitely better than a 200mm L.

F/8 is a really narrow depth of field. F/8 & F/16 R not a problem when using a tripod & a modern digital camera. The Canon's focusing squares R useless. It's too blurry & dark. Unfortunately, F/16 brings out all your sensor dirt.

U need to fabricate a lens platform to mount it on a tripod. It's too heavy to hang off the camera body.

Focus guides on T mount lenses R worthless because they always go on the bottom, but it still has a focus guide.

It can make out the space station solar panels & fill 1/2 the frame with the moon. It can't see Jupiter's bands.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Sony DSC-W710 16 MP Digital Camera with 2.7-Inch LCD (Silver)

Sony DSC-W710 16 MP Digital Camera with 2.7-Inch LCD
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
Buy Now
Customer review from the Amazon Vine Program This little Sony camera is very compact and light, and is a good starter point and shoot at this price. I take lots of pictures, so I was able to put this camera through its paces over about a three-week period. Here is a run-down:

The Good

Very light and fits in any pocket

Relatively low cost and does not "feel expensive", so I do not hesitate to just toss it in my pocket or bag

Has proven to be rugged. Has survived abuse (per the above bullet) very well

Love the "Easy" feature. It detects background light, fast action, faces, and other photo situations automatically. You can override this feature in the menus option.

Has plenty of photo-taking options such as landscapes, beach, toy, b&w. As mentioned below in not-so-good, these features are pretty cumbersome to get to.

Picture quality is very good for this price range. There is no RAW file option, so you are totally dependent on the camera's JPEG processor, which is okay but has a lot of interpolation. It is a little slow to process, but definitely adequate below $100.

Uses SD cards, not the proprietary memory stick that Sony had used in the past.

The Not So Good

Very menu-driven, so it takes time to find a photo feature (such as toy, b&w, beach, landscape, etc.) and you could miss your shot. Best to stay in Auto/Easy mode since it does a decent job of choosing for you.

You have to navigate the menu to deactivate Easy mode before other options become available to you. This will slow you down a lot and may cause you to miss some shots. Ideally they would have any Easy mode on/off button on the camera itself.

The processor is slow, so there is a noticeable pause between shots. The continuous shooting mode labors through about one shot per second.

The post-processing and photo enhancing features on the camera are of limited usefulness. For example, it has a face enhancement feature that I found was only slightly effective. You will do MUCH better using your inexpensive desktop photo software to add enhancements. IMHO, this feature on the camera is more of a gimmick with primitive algorithms.

Sony has opted to use a non-standard USB connector. I like standard connectors that can be shared between devices. For this one, you will need to carry around the cord if you want to charge the camera's battery or transfer photos using USB.

To charge, you plug in the camera. The battery is removable, but the camera does not come with a separate battery charger, so you have to use the camera as the charger. In other words, you cannot charge a spare while you are using the camera. There may be an accessory for this, but then you are spending extra $$ on a low cost camera.

Recommendation

If you want a low-cost, decent point and shoot, this is a good choice, particularly if you want to stay in easy mode most of the time. If you end up loving photography, or if you are already an experienced photographer, this camera will feel light on features and customization options pretty quickly.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Panasonic TC-P65ZT60 65-Inch 1080p 600Hz 3D Smart Plasma TV

Panasonic TC-P65ZT60 65-Inch 1080p 600Hz 3D Smart Plasma TV
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
As a consumer who actually bought the ZT60, I think I can put a few things into perspective. Back in '09 I saw a demo of a 50" Pioneer Kuro plasma (the industry reference for black level quality until now) at a store with the lights switched off. Yes, I was impressed. Blacks looked visibly black. A couple of months ago I went to a Magnolia (Best Buy) store to see if the ZT60 could live up to its hype. The ZT60 was not in a controlled demo room but was placed on a wall directly under a VT60 with a lot of ambient store lighting. Under such lighting conditions, I honestly couldn't see the difference in black level between the VT60 and the ZT60. The main advantage of the ZT60 under bright lighting was somewhat less reflectivity/screen glare. I asked for a demo in the dark demo room but only a VT60 was in the room. I checked out the blacks using night scenes off my own "Taxi Driver" and "American Werewolf in London" BluRay discs. Blacks were inky black. Since I couldn't do an A-B comparison between a VT60, ZT60, or the Pioneer Kuro TV for black level using the same material the best I can do was base my comparisons of black level on memory. Given the Kuro's already impressive performance, can anything else "blow it out of the water", as some posters on CNET put it? I'll just say that the Kuro has finally been laid to rest. But let me say that when a black screen appears on the VT60 it looks extremely dark already.

When looking at a black screen on my ZT60 at home at night with the lights off, it appears that the unit is practically turned off (really). At that level, it's just an exercise in futility to compare it to a Kuro and split hairs. It's plenty good enough for me.

In overall performance it handily beats the very best LED backlit LCDs I've seen, including the current Ultra HD 4K sets (except in resolution) I've seen (since all of them use LED backlighting). At this point, you may be wondering why I would compare a 1080P HDTV to a 2160P (4K) set. Based on the demos of 4K sets that I've seen on 60 to 65-inch screens, the difference (really just resolution) between 1080P and 2160P is only visible when you are standing several inches in front of the screen. Most people would rather view from several feet away in a living room setting. Also, the 4K demo material is video-based. I can't imagine seeing any more detail even from a transfer of a 70mm film print when seated at a normal viewing distance in a living room. In terms of 4K sources, the Blu-Ray format does not support that resolution, leaving Sony to offer a $600 4K media box that only works with their own brand of 4K TVs. There's another alternative in the form of an even more expensive source component. But all this points to a shaky start for yet another format that provides little benefit to consumers. In fact, 4K is just a transitional format for the 2nd tier of the Ultra HD standard, 8K. So why buy 4K at all? Anyway, I digress.

Back to the subject of overall picture quality. With all the statements about black level, you'd think that that was the only important picture parameter. I'll say that one of the first things I noticed about both the VT60 and ZT60 were the great reproduction of different shades of gray (maybe better than the Kuro set which had a tendency to crush dark shades of gray to black). On the ZT60 there seems to be, if anything, also a noticeable advantage in the reproduction of red. Reds are reproduced with a natural purity I've never seen before. I can't comment on the 3D performance of the ZT60 because I don't have a 3D BluRay player but I briefly converted a 2D Blu-Ray to 3D. The motion seemed to appear with the "soap opera" (video) effect. That said, 3D performance is not important to me so I consider the feature to be a "throw in" anyway.

My only pet peeve about all the professional reviews I've read about the ZT60 is the statement that SD sources look great. While it's true that DVDs appear extremely good on the ZT60 when using an HDMI connection, the aforementioned statement is obviously based on the reproduction of DVDs (which occasionally look like HD sources) and broadcasts. I say this because there is no support for legacy sources that use the S-Video connection. I've seen so many professional reviewers trash this connection by saying that making an S-Video connection was awkward (well, you don't do it often, do you?). Yet, there is no criticism of the old composite video connection's quality. I don't think a professional reviewer would mind putting up with the minor inconvenience, given the composite connection's dot crawl from inherent crosstalk between the luminance (black & white) and chrominance (color) signals. As expensive as the ZT60 is, you'd think that an S-Video input would be included. How much can such an input cost? I make a big deal about this because I have a lot of S-VHS recordings of material I simply can't buy or don't care to buy again in another format and I also have some laserdiscs. The composite input of the ZT60 rolls off the high end of the video signal. Looking at an S-VHS recording of a standard definition Snell & Wilcox resolution test pattern through the composite connection shows a horizontal resolution of well under 300 lines. Yet looking at the same recording through the S-Video input of my old old SDTV shows roughly 410 lines. So what to do? The receiver connected to my ZT60 doesn't have S-Video inputs either so I can't use it for any handshaking between the S-VHS VCR and the ZT60. Fortunately, I have a D-VHS machine that has S-Video inputs and HDMI outputs so I can either play my S-Video recordings through this machine or use its S-Video inputs for my S-VHS VCR (which does a better job playing S-VHS videos) along with the HDMI outputs to the receiver. Result? The 410 lines of resolution appears on the ZT60 and the recordings closely approach DVD quality.

Despite the S-Video omission, I still believe the ZT60 is a 5-star product. Its reduced screen glare/reflectivity, its practically perfect black level, the great reproduction of shadow detail, and extremely accurate colors have seduced me already. In fact, these performance parameters are unrivaled. As I've already mentioned, the first parameter cannot be matched by the current generation of higher resolution Ultra HD TV sets, given their use of LED-backlit technology.

To make the most out of the ZT60, I switch to the THX Cinema mode, load a Spears & Munsil Blu-Ray calibration disc then adjust the black-level, contrast, sharpness according to the disc's test patterns and set the color temperature to the normal setting. I didn't find the recommended picture adjustments of CNET reviewer, David Katzmaier, helpful. In fact, the settings seem to appear way off when looking at the results when using my OPPO BDP-83 Blu-Ray player as a source.

In a nutshell, I'd list the Pros vs. Cons as follows:

Pros:

Unrivaled picture quality

Extremely accurate colors/color temperature in the THX mode/EBU modes right out of the box

Beats The Pioneer Kuros black level and gray scale reproduction

Low screen glare/reflectivity compared to all other plasmas to date

Cons:

Expensive

No S-video input to make the most of S-VHS sources; composite video input rolls off high-end and makes SD sources appear duller than they are

Comment |

Looking for voting buttons? Sorry, we don't let customers vote on their own reviews.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Pentax K-30 Weather-Sealed 16 MP CMOS Digital SLR with 18-55mm

Pentax K-30 Weather-Sealed 16 MP CMOS Digital SLR with 18-55mm and 55-300mm Lenses
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
List Price: $999.95
Sale Price: $658.98
Today's Bonus: 34% Off
Buy Now

I have been shooting photographs since the 1970's. An avid fan of digital since it's inception I had moved up from basic cameras to a nice entry level Nikon DSLR in 2011. Feeling I needed something a little more serious I began researching the 'prosumer' class cameras including top end APS-C camers from several quality manufacturers. A little reluctant to move from Nikon I warily looked at specs of other higher APS-C sensor cameras. Not feeling I could justify the cost of a full frame DSLR but wanting a higher level of preformance I found the specs of this camera to be as appealing as it's price point, Went ahead and ordered the two lens kit with the 55-300mm lens and am totally satisfied!

The camera has a really nice feel to it. I don't have huge hands but average, and it feels really good and secure in one hand. The weight is good, a nice solid feel and well balanced even with the 55-300mm lens attached. I was pleased to see that with the 18-55 lens, though somewhat heavier than my Nikon D3100, this camera is more compact (shorter) since the VR is built into the camera and not the lens, allowing a more compact lens.

The auto focus is quick and accurate, the continuous focus being amazing! The hi burst shooting mode (about 6 fps) is amazing too. It shoots so fast you cant even count the exposures but the images are fabulous.

Great resolution, amazingly fast and clear up to 3200 ISO speed, shooting into the night. This camera has quickly become my best friend! You will not be disappointed!

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Olympus PEN E-PM1 12.3MP Interchangeable Camera with CMOS

Olympus PEN E-PM1 12.3MP Interchangeable Camera with CMOS Sensor, 3-inch LCD and 14-42mm II Lens
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
List Price: $499.00
Sale Price: $249.00
Today's Bonus: 50% Off
Buy Now

Update (4/27/2012)

==============

Note about Olympus service. It turns out that my camera had an issue with taking picture at fast shutter speed (1/4000s). I called the service and sent it in. It was fixed by week's end, and was shipped it out by 2nd Day Air. It was all for free as my camera is still under warranty. I did not get a refurbished unit; I got mine back. When I tested my 'fixed' camera, I found everything was working as expected and no more problems at high shutter speed. Big kudos for Olympus service!

Update (2/6/2012)

==============

One key feature I forgot to mention is the in-body image stablization (IBIS). Olympus has the IBIS whereas Panasonic only supports the IS built into the lens. There are PROs and CONs of IBIS. However this comes in handy in many cases, and I prefer camera having IBIS where some lenses do not come with IS built-in (OIS). Some of my lenses do not have OIS, and if I do not use IBIS on Olympus, images would not be as sharp. On the other hand, people say that IBIS is not ideal for the video recording. I have not noticed much, but I can see how.

On the other hand, Olympus will announce E-M5 (OM-D family) this week. This one will support 5 axis IS (still an IBIS) which is expected to be much better than the IBIS that current models have. Some on the DPREVIEW forum say that this one will be better than OIS... we'll have to wait for some product review for the verdict.

Important Update (11/21/2011)

=====================

Firmware version 1.1 is now available from Olympus. It was surprising from a company that is going through a financial trouble :) The firmware version 1.1 is supposed to address an issue with EyeFi (Wifi SD + memory) card. Although I do not use the EyeFi card, I thought I will give it a try and updated my camera with some worries as one reviewer on DPREVIEW.com reported that camera became 'brick' after the update.

I used 'Olympus Digital Camera Updater' software that came with my camera. I used my Mac Mini to update the firmware. Everything took less than 2 minutes, and I got large "OK" sign on the LCD display. Upon recycling the power, the camera reported firmware version 1.1 correctly. I took about 50 shots after the update, and so far so good.

My original review

============

This is my fourth camera purchase this year... yet this is the best one. My other three cameras were point-and-shoot cameras that gave me some good photos but in-door shots with high iso gave me very grainy images. Nikon P300 is pretty good with F1.8; however image sensor was little too small and that results in lower image quality in some occasion.

I also have Canon T1i which takes photos with really good image quality; however I run into the portability issue. I'm not as big of a photo enthusiast (I know... I just love buying new camera) and I do not feel comfortable carrying my Canon T1i everywhere. It is simply too bulky.

My definition of 'perfect' camera is one that I can take most everywhere and take photos with good image quality in every situation.

I did a lot of research for the 'perfect' camera, and I quickly came down to the following selections:

1) Sony NEX family Sony NEX 3, 5, C3, 5N, and 7.

-------------------------------------------------------------

These are wonderful camera. Small, and versatile, and especially with APS-C size image sensor, image quality (IQ) rivals regular dSLRs. However the limitations are the fact that they use Sony proprietary lenses and there are limited number of NEX lenses.

2) Samsung N100/N200

-------------------------------------------------------------

These are similar to Sony NEX. I haven't seen them in person; however these should deliver similar IQ with the APS-C size sensors. However they do have the same issue of using Samsung proprietary lens mount + format.

3) Nikon 1, Pentax Q, and Fujifilm X100

-------------------------------------------------------------

Ok, Fujifilm X100 has APS-C size sensor; however it has a single fixed lens on the camera. Good lens, but you cannot replace lens. Nikon and Pentax recently announced their new compact system cameras, however their system uses smaller size sensor. Pentax uses even smaller and Nikon uses sensor about 1/2 of Micro Four Thirds. I like Nikon but I felt the lens collection + size sensor was disappointment at this time.

4) Then there are Micro Four Thirds cameras... these include Olympus e-P1,P2,P3, e-PL1,PL2,PL3, and e-PM1 and Panasonic GF1, GF2, and GF3, and other G series cameras.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Micro Four Thirds cameras can use any lenses that adhere to the Micro Four Thirds standards. Therefore there are more lens selections available at the time of my research than any other compact system cameras.

My decision was more of my budget and my future direction... I want to build my lens library first; however I wanted to get best value for my budget. In my opinion, Olympus e-PM1 was the best choice.

My selection of Olympus E-PM1 was for its compact size and versatility of the camera. yes, it may not have all physical control buttons. That was problem when I was looking at the camera; however it's not as bad as I thought. You can get to the settings quickly and you actually have control of most of settings that you can think of... And you can easily set your focus area, if you don't want the camera to choose for you :)

Based on my research Olympus E-PM1 has pretty much the same hardware as more expensive and little bigger E-PL3. This means that it now has new dual core image processor (TruePic VI) and very fast auto-focus system. This all means that this Olympus E-PM1 is very responsive and good performer in everyday use.

It's been about a week and I took almost 900 photos with single battery charge(battery life is good). I now have Panasonic 20mm F1.7 pancake lens on the camera and that one is really good for photo taking. (I won't recommend it for video.. due to noise issue). With my F/1.7 lens, I haven't really had need for a flash on the camera. In fact, I have not even tried it yet. Camera takes good IQ and very fast auto focus. I love how i can control so many settings on the camera. I don't think I had this much fun with my Canon T1i.

NOTE: For Mac users out there, this ACHVD format on 1080i video would be little problem as there are no native support for the format yet.

Pros for Olympus E-PM1

--------------------------------------------------------------

Compact size (smaller than other micro four thirds)

Good Image Quality (comparable to dSLRs)

Fast auto focus speed

large number of available lenses (micro four thirds)

Available Hot Shoe; you can use external flash

Cons for Olympus E-PM1

--------------------------------------------------------------

no built-in flash (having something is better than nothing)

not pocketable, unless you are talking about your winter jacket

Limited availability of button control; it's ok but for some this would be strong 'con"

Video format (ACHVD MTS format is not for computer... Mac software not as widely available)

Built-in image stabilization may not work perfectly for the video; it works well for still images.

(UPDATE 11/15/2011) It may be my camera, however I cannot use shutter speed 1/3200 or 1/4000s. Images get too dark at the bottom of picture. However I rarely need these shutter speed; therefore I do not see this is a show stopper.

* Image Sensor size discussion

--------------------------------------------------------------

Here are some measure of image sensors used on various digital cameras today:

Typical point-and-shoot, sensor=1/2.33", sensor size=~28.5mm^2, crop factor=5.62

Advanced point-and-shoot, sensor=1/1.6", sensor size=~48.6mm^2, crop factor=4.3

micro-four-thirds, sensor=MFT, sensor size=~225mm^2, crop factor=2

Canon dSLR, sensor=APS-C, sensor size=~329mm^2, crop factor=1.6

Other dSLR (Nikon,Sony), sensor=APS-C, sensor size=~369mm^2, crop factor=1.5

Olympus E-PM1 has micro four thirds format sensor, i.e. it has surface area of 225mm^2 which is significantly larger than typical point-and-shoot camera. Olympus E-PM1 has more than 4.6x bigger image sensor to pick up more lights than advanced point-and-shoot camera.

* Comparison between Point-and-Shoot and Olympus E-PM1

------------------------------------------------------------------

Olympus E-PM1, as a micro four thirds camera, has significantly bigger MOS sensor and you can go to ISO1600 and still have good image quality. I posted an example of image that was taken with ISO1600 with F11. This still has fairly good image quality even with high ISO. Of course, the image quality would be less accurate in dimly lit condition. However Olympus E-PM1 still has much better image quality than other point-and-shoot camera. I compared picture taken with Olympus E-PM1 and Nikon P300, and Olympus wins hands down.

* Olympus E-PM1 User Interface

-----------------------------------------------------------------

As noted above, Olympus E-PM1 does not have as many manual control buttons. You don't even have 'mode' button. P/A/S/M has to be selected via menu button. Although this may be problem for some users, many users will find it adequate. There are even customizable buttons that you can assign "video record" button as "DOF preview". Other controls, such as changing ISO, aperture value, shutter speed, are fairly simple. Olympus E-PM1 gives you so much control over camera settings.

* RAW image format (Updated 11/15/2011)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Olympus E-PM1 has good RAW image setting (.ORF format). Included Olympus Viewer 2 software can be used to develop RAW images into JPG format images.

I am happy to report that the following software support E-PM1 ORF format:

Adobe Element 9 with the latest update (ACR 6.5 and later)

Aperture 3.2.1

Summary

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Olympus E-PM1 is a solid camera with good functionalities. It is small enough to be almost pocketable yet provides many advanced functionalities that rivals entry level dSLRs. As a micro four thirds camera, there are good set of lenses from multiple manufacturers, and Olympus has built very responsive camera with good image quality (IQ) sensor with this E-PM1. This camera should appeal to those of you looking to move up to more advanced camera from their point-and-shoot camera or someone with dSRLs looking for a smaller, competent camera. I do admit that this camera is not 'perfect' camera; however this camera is one of the best value for a compact system camera today.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Celestron NexStar 8 SE Telescope

Celestron NexStar 8 SE Telescope
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
List Price: $1,199.00
Sale Price: $999.00
Today's Bonus: 17% Off
Buy Now

The five stars represent my opinion about the scope. I'm a novice at astronomy, so I can't really make any comparisons. I can tell you, however, that this scope does everything I've ever read about it. I pulled it out of the box and put it together and it went to work just the way the book said. I've done some solar viewing and a little digital astrophotography. My major purpose for this scope is in the area of deep-sky astrophotography without spending multiple thousands of bucks. It may be a little overkill for a novice like myself, but I wanted a scope that I wouldn't outgrow, and one that is easy to accessorize. The only thing I can nit-pick on this scope is the motor drives on the mount. They work fine, but they make a little too much noise, and the sound indicates to me that the gear train is not high quality components. It does seem to run very smooth, though! And accurate, every time! If YOU take the time to accurately set it up and aim it, then IT will put what ever you ask for right in the middle of your field of view. The battery holder is a little tight on the 2000mah NiMH AA batteries that I bought for it, but since I plan to use the AC adapter I bought for it, that's not really a big problem. I wish Celestron had designed the bubble-level INTO the base of the mount rather than just leave it loose for the user to install with the double stick tape on it's bottom. I bought a larger level from an RV store and epoxied it to the top of the battery cover. It seems to be very accurate and my alignment seems to work every time. I recommend a good variety of eyepiece filters, a solar filter for the main aperture, a 45deg. upright diagonal, and several eyepieces to cover the range from about 4mm to 32mm. Zhumell and Celestron both offer good filter/eyepiece sets at very good prices here on Amazon. For the astrophotographer, there's a whole world of accessories to chose from for this scope, and this is where I learned just how bad Celestron's customer support is! A lot of accessories out there state they are compatible with the Celestron C8 and 8i scopes, but this 8SE is so new that it isn't mentioned very often. I was concerned about the differences in the three 8" scopes, so I submitted an inquiry to Celestron's customer support, asking for a description of the differences in the C8, 8i and the new 8SE scopes. After four days they closed my ticket without answering my questions, so I submitted another request. After 14 days there was no response. I called them and the fellow I talked to had to put me on hold three times for about ten minutes each while he went to ask someone for answers. Shouldn't they man the tech-support phones with people that know the differences in their own products? All I was asking is if the visual back from a C8 will fit the 8i and 8SE, and if the solar filters for a C8 will fit the 8SE. He didn't know! I just hope my scope doesn't break because their tech support is less than helpfull. . Just don't expect Celestron to be there for you without a lot of prodding.

By the way, for anyone considering this scope, the best info I've found is that all of the eyepiece accessories that will fit the rear cell of the C8 will also fit the 8i and the newer 8SE. The Celestron tech had to go actually test fit a visual back from the C8 to an 8SE to find out! He did say that any filters for the main aperture (the big end where light enters) of the C8 will not fit the 8i or 8SE! There was a significant dimension change made there.

I hope this helps eliminate the frustration I had in selecting and buying any accessories that anyone buying this scope may have. Happy star-gazing!

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Anviz L100 Fingerprint Biometric Door Lock

Anviz L100 Fingerprint Biometric Door Lock
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
Buy Now
I have never written a product review before, but I felt it necessary in this case. We purchased this lock as a method to secure a room in our house from our children. During installation, one of the posts that the screws attach to broke clean off. I have never had anything like this happen before and I thought maybe I somehow just over-torqued it.

So I took the lock apart, tapped the actual plate and reassembled it with new, longer screws. Once I had it back together it worked exactly ONCE before the spindle between the two handles snapped. I still cannot figure out for the life of me why someone would make the spindle out of two pieces tacked together?? The "weld" if you could even call it that is obviously a weak point.

It would do no good to return the lock because I had already drilled the door. Besides, it was simply a design/quality of construction issue. So I was not confident that the next one they sent would be any better. So I fashioned a new (one piece) spindle out of 5/16" steel key stock. I will say this: after my 2 repairs and several hours of labor, the lock does seem to be working well. But I expect MUCH better quality out of a lock at this price point.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Nikon F3 HP SLR Film Camera Body 35mm F3/HP High Eyepoint

Nikon F3 HP SLR Film Camera Body 35mm F3/HP High Eyepoint Viewfinder
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
I owned several of these over the years and loved them. My favourite was a mint F3hp I bought on ebay. Had a couple of titanium bodies go through my ebay trading days and they were a work of stunning beauty--especially the champagne colour bodies. Smoother winder than the F2 and as solid as a tank. The HP viewfinder was excellent and if you looked through one today after your DSLR it would be quite a shock. Pity the film days are over as it was a lot more fun than digital and the stuff was much better made. And they wouldn't change specs every 6 months but about every 6 or 7 years. Nothing like the feel of a F2 or F3 and those awesome manual Nikkors that lasted forever and produced stunning results. Remember the 105mm f1.8? Or the razor sharp 28mm f2.8 Ais? Those were the days my friends! The 70-80's were the decades that Nikon ruled the world. As soon as they started building their stuff in China the mantle fell to Canon (and their MIJ equipment). Things may get better in digital world as the nostalgia is creepng back with Fuji X series and monster expensive Leica and especially Olympus and their OMD-5. Maybe Nikon ought to release a F3d?

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Zoom Lens + Canon 2400 DSLR

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Zoom Lens + Canon 2400 DSLR Gadget Bag Case + Tripod + Kit for EOS 60D, 7D, 5D Mark II III, Rebel T3, T3i, T4i Digital SLR Cameras
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
I have done a lot of research in the internet to find comments about these lenses whether they are worth it or not. And I must say, that I am totally convinced. The lenses are fantastic. The handling, the images, at least everything is great. The only problem is the high price. Well, everyone has to find out for himself. But up to now, I would repeat this purchase.

Considering this special purchase: I have thought about buying the lenses alone. But in the end, the added gadgets are worth the added price. On the other hand, everyone has to decide for himself. Right now, I do not have a bag and only one tripot. But in combination with a separate flash another tripod would be helpful. Ok, it is a cheap one (worth 25$), but it will help. The bag is better in the end pretty fine with the lenses I need to carry. But in total, for me it is worth the additional price.

The other stuff is nice.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Nikon D7000 16.2MP DX-Format CMOS Digital SLR with 3.0-Inch LCD

Nikon D7000 16.2MP DX-Format CMOS Digital SLR with 3.0-Inch LCD with Nikon 18-105mm ED VR AF-S DX Nikkor Autofocus Lens & Nikon Normal AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D Autofocus Lens & Nikon AF-S DX VR Zoom-Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED Lens with SSE Pro Series 16GB
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
I will not be writing the merits / demerits of the product itself. I guess there are multiple sites already offering that info. What I will write about is my experience with the seller (Sunset Electronics) and some general info on the kit.

The item arrived well packaged. A few things were left out (manuals for the camera, lenses, wrong tripod, cleaning kit missing) which the seller promptly shipped out the next day. One thing to note though is that the camera seems to be from the gray market (serial number ends with a "C", maybe for sale in 'China'). A little surprised that Amazon would allow their marketplace vendors to sell items meant for sale in other countries (& hence the lower price, I guess). In any case, when I spoke with the CS dept, they acknowledged the fact that the camera was retail and that any warranty issues would need to go thru their store, and that I would not be able to resolve directly with Nikon. Registering the cam and lenses online wasn't a problem. Good experience overall.

I would recommend that other folks first check with the retailer on the product details and then make up your mind. Camera is awesome and the kit lenses, etc are ok (managed my expectations upfront) but will satisfy any novice users (like me!).

I will update the review in a few months with my experience. Meanwhile, happy clicking!!

*****************************************************************

Update June 20, 2013 Camera continues to perform without any hiccups. Looks like Sunset electronics is back with their d7000 kit option on Amazon ;-) ...I've never used any of the misc items (telephoto lens, tripod, lens strap....) that came with the kit. Did get a good quality tripod, a better, longer, & inconspicuous shoulder strap and have been quite happy thus far!!

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Nikon D3100 Digital Camera + Nikon 18-55 VR Zoom Lens + Nikon

Nikon D3100 Digital Camera + Nikon 18-55 VR Zoom Lens + Nikon 70-300 Telephoto Zoom Lens + .40x Super Wide Angle Fisheye Lens + 2x Telephoto Lens + 4 Piece Macro Kit + 16GB Memory Card + 3 Year Celltime Warranty
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
Best camera we have ever owned. We have used it on several special occasional and have some great pictures. We are still learning what all the features do so far we love it!!!!

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Leica M9-P 18MP Full-Frame Digital Rangefinder Camera (Silver

Leica M9-P 18MP Full-Frame Digital Rangefinder Camera
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
This is my second Leica digital rangefinder camera. I saved up to buy an M8 not too long after they were introduced only to find the camera superseded just a few months later by the M8.2 and then made entirely obsolete by the M9. More important, certainly, was that I was never overwhelmed by the picture quality from the M8. It always seemed that I obtained better results with my Nikon D300, so the M8 never became an integral part of my shooting repertoire.

After reading all the glowing reviews of the M9 I decided to try the Leica rangefinder one last time (I have three wonderful lenses that I used with the M8 and before that with an M6), so I sold both my M8 [at a considerable loss] and my entire Panasonic micro 4/3 kit (which was actually a very nice interchangeable lens digital camera system) to finance my purchase of the M9. Although I purchase most of my camera equipment through Amazon, I purchased my M9-P from a Leica dealer because Amazon did not have the camera in stock at the time. Obviously, there is no particular difference between the M9 and the M9-P, other than essentially cosmetics, so this review applies equally to both versions of the camera.

My initial reaction on removing the camera from its box for the first time was that it is infrequent and, perhaps, rare these days to obtain such a high quality piece of equipment. The camera feels perfect in the hand, well-balanced and fairly small, yet with a certain heft. As odd as it sounds, is a real joy to hold and use. Further reactions on using the camera for the first time were that the electronics are light years removed from those of the best DSLRs of today. I am fortunate enough to have a Nikon D800 as well, and the automatic metering system in the Nikon far surpasses that of the M9. Write speed to storage media in the Nikon is orders of magnitude faster than in the M9. Further, where with the Nikon I just, literally, point-and-shoot to obtain [usually] a great picture, I've found that shooting with the Leica requires thought and consideration. I cannot just point the camera in the direction of the landscape and expect a properly exposed image, as I would obtain with the the D800. Instead I frequently have to point the camera towards the ground to avoid an underexposure caused by the M9's old-fashioned metering system. I check the histogram frequently. And I encountered many more out of focus shots with the Leica. The rangefinder is great but it is no match for the Nikon's autofocus system.

Where the Leica really shines, however, is in final image quality, and isn't that why one buys a camera of this type in the first place? Although the M9's sensor has half the number of megapixels as the sensor in the D800 I've found that, when comparing identical test images of landscape scenes, shot side-by-side on a tripod, the images shot with the Leica, without exception, exhibit greater acuity, depth and, surprisingly, sharpness than those shot with the D800. My purpose in this review is not to bash the D800, as it is an important and essential tool in my work, but rather to point out that in a comparison with this extraordinary camera, the M9, in my personal opinion, comes out on top.

I love the image quality produced by the inimitable Leica lenses, the way the camera feels and its light weight and portability. I haven't enjoyed photography this much in a long time!

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>