Showing posts with label cheapest digital camera in. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cheapest digital camera in. Show all posts

Samsung LN37A550 37-Inch 1080p LCD HDTV

Samsung LN37A550 37-Inch 1080p LCD HDTV
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
Buy Now
I bought the Samsung LN37A550 from Amazon in mid-May. I comparison shopped for several months, and found that the Samsung is on equal footing as the Sony Bravia XBR-Series KDL-37XBR6 37-Inch 1080p LCD HDTV and Sharp Aquos LC37D64U 37-Inch 1080p LCD HDTV models in performance, but (at the time) was more affordable than either. Here's an in-depth run-down of the top-of-the line models from each of those three brands using MY comparison criteria. Hopefully it helps you.

Price

These are prices from Amazon.com (not their "marketplace partners" or whatever they're called). I'd recommend purchasing from Amazon itself, as they offer the free "white-glove" delivery, which means that the delivery company will bring the TV into your house, unpack it, and haul away the packing materials. My TV was delivered 3 days after I ordered it, and many others who reviewed on this site have had the same experience.

Also, keep in mind Amazon's financing offers if you open an Amazon.com credit account see below for more details.

Samsung LN37A550: Retail is $1200. I've watched Amazon's price fluctuate between $1040 and $1200. Today the price is $1064, which is as good as I've seen. In addition, Samsung TVs often have financing deals mine was 1-year, no payments and no-interest financing, and I've also seen 18-month specials.

Sharp LC37D64U: Retail is $1400, and the fact that it was selling for about $1350 a month ago strongly influenced my decision. Today the price is $1016, which may have changed my purchase based solely on the size (Sharp is slightly narrower see below and the Samsung is a REALLY tight squeeze in my space). I have not seen ANY financing deals on Sharp TVs through Amazon pay it all up front.

Sony KDL-37XBR6: Retail is $1500. Today's price on Amazon is $1400 a major consideration (about $350 price difference), but there's also a 36 (read it again, 36) month no interest offer on this TV right now. Minimum monthly payments are required.

Contrast Ratio, Response Time, and Frame Refresh Rate

Keep in mind that different manufacturers use different methods to measure these specifications, so they can not be simply compared using numbers. All I can say is that I viewed them in a couple of different retail locations, and there is little difference in picture brightness / blurring between these models. All are capable of 1080p picture.

Samsung: 15,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio and 5 ms response time. 60 hZ refresh rate.

Sharp: 10,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio and 6 ms response time. 60 hZ refresh rate.

Sony: 25,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio and unpublished response time. 120 hZ refresh rate. The refresh rate is where the Sony has an advantage over the others. I'm not going to get into it here, but here's a great article from CircuitCity.com explaining refresh rate in clear, simple terms ( All I'll say is that, in-store with a BluRay disc, the 120 hZ setting on a 46" screen looked AWESOME. Some have complained that it produces a "soap-opera" effect. Not being a big fan of soap-operas, I have no idea what they are referring to. Personally, I don't think it's enough of a reason to spend the extra $300+, because of screen size. With a bigger 50"+ screen, your eye will catch blurring across the screen, but on a screen of this size I have never noticed any blurring with my 60 hZ model.

High-Def Inputs

These all have the HD connections below, along with Digital Audio outputs, and other (S-video and composite video, and stereo audio) inputs.

Samsung: 3 version 1.3 (latest) HDMI Inputs (2 in rear, 1 on side), 1 USB input (for viewing JPGs and listening to MP3s), 1 PC input, and 2 component video inputs.

Sharp: 2 HDMI Inputs (Amazon and Sharp's website don't say they are version 1.3, which is supposedly faster and therefore better quality), 1 PC input, and 2 component video inputs. Also has side inputs.

Sony: 4 HDMI Inputs (3 in rear, 1 on side; again, Amazon and Sony don't say version 1.3, but I would think it's GOT to be..... don't know why they wouldn't publish this, though), 1 PC input, and 2 component video inputs.

Sound

Most reviews I have read complain about the Samsung's sound quality (most common in complaint is that the speakers sound "tinny"). I turned off the speakers before I ever hooked the TV up to an input (I've got a surround sound system), so I can't speak to this. I bought the TV for the picture, not the sound, but if that's important to you, read other reviews. I've read a couple of complaints about the Sharp model, but they didn't seem quite so angry as the complaints regarding Samsung, so I'm guessing it's acceptable sound.

Size

Size can be a consideration for many in purchasing a TV of this size. I was space constrained only in width. If you've got space constraints and 37" in width, you might also consider the Toshiba REGZA 40RF350U Super Narrow 40-Inch 1080p LCD HDTV Super Narrow Bezel, which measures just 36.77" wide. I have not seen it in action, so I can't speak to it's performance, but other Toshiba LCDs that I HAVE seen did not compare to these 3 TVs in picture quality.

Samsung: 36.1 inches wide and 40 pounds with stand (32 pounds without)

Sharp: 35 and 23/64" wide (yes, some people really squeeze that tight) and 45 pounds with stand (39 without)

Sony: 36.3 inches wide and 47 pounds with stand (40 without)

Warranty

All of these TVs have 1 year parts / 1 year labor manufacturer warranties.

Additional features:

Each brand offers their own graphics processing engine that claims to be the greatest thing ever, as well as other features. One interesting feature which is really more of a marketing ploy is connecting other devices made by the same brand to this TV and just being able to use the TV's remote to control that device. For example, buy a Sony TV and a Sony Blu-Ray player, and you can control the Blu-Ray player without reprogramming your remote. Good if you don't want to buy a Universal Remote, but I see it more as a way to get you to buy more components from that brand. Your choice!

So there you have it. I can say with a lot of certainty that you will be pleased with any of these three models, and it's more a matter of preference for a certain brand, pricing sensitivity, and the sound issue that you have to make up your mind. As for me, I couldn't be happier with my Samsung purchase.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens for Canon SLR Cameras

Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens for Canon SLR Cameras
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
Fisheye lenses come in two varieties. Both types create a heavily barrel-distorted image that provides a roughly 180 degree field of view. Circular fisheyes create a circular image that falls entirely within the frame, leaving black around the edges. The circular image covers a full 180 degrees in all directions. Diagonal fisheyes, which fill the frame, give a 180 degree view only along the frame's diagonals. With both types, a crop-frame camera such as a Canon Rebel or 50D will reduce the field of view significantly unless the fisheye lens is specificially designed for a crop-frame sensor. This will have the effect of significantly reducing the fisheye effect, which is at its most dramatic around the edges of the image (precisely the area lost by crop-frame sensors).

The EF 15mm f/2.8 is a diagonal fisheye designed originally for 35mm film cameras, and now usable on full-frame cameras such as the Canon 1Ds or 5D. It is one of the oldest SLR lenses that Canon still manufactures: it was introduced in 1987 as one of the first generation of EF-mount lenses, and does not seem to have been updated at all in the intervening 22 years, even as most of its siblings have been replaced by newer designs.

It is a fairly compact, lightweight lens with a metal mount and a plastic shell. Build quality is fairly typical of Canon's mid-range consumer lenses. A small petal-shaped hood is built in and cannot be removed. Because the front element is convex, there are no threads to mount filters in front, though gel filters can be mounted in the back. The front lens cap, oddly, is only held in place by friction, but so far I haven't seen it fall off.

Auto-focus is provided by the Arc-Form Drive (AFD) motor that was standard in the early EF lenses, which is somewhat noisier than more modern technologies. Fortunately, it doesn't have to move very much to focus, so it still manages to focus pretty quickly. The manual-focus ring spins freely when the lens is in auto-focus mode.

Image sharpness, contrast, and color are quite good, and the lens can focus down to 20 cm (about 8"), which allows for the kind of dramatic perspectives that fisheye lenses are famous for. There are some chromatic aberrations around the edges, but these can be easily corrected in software if you're shooting digital. Every once in a while, when the sun is just out of the frame, I will see a bit of flare, though oddly this never seems to happen when the sun is actually IN the frame.

With only five aperture blades, the lens cannot be expected to deliver pretty out-of-focus highlights; on the other hand, a 15mm lens has naturally deep focus, so it can be a challenge to get anything far enough out of focus that the highlights matter. In practice, this is hardly ever a problem.

This is a fun lens that makes high-quality pictures. Despite its rather outdated design, it does a good job and I recommend it.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Opteka 650-2600mm High Definition Telephoto Zoom Lens

Opteka 650-2600mm High Definition Telephoto Zoom Lens for Panasonic Lumix DMC G1, GH1, GF1, G10, G2 GH2, GF2, Olympus PEN E-P1, E-P2, E-PL1, E-PL1s, E-PL2 and other Micro Four Thirds Digital SLR Cameras
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
List Price: $499.95
Sale Price: $249.00
Today's Bonus: 50% Off
Buy Now

For those of you who have wanted a very long telephoto lens, you can't go wrong with this one. It is heavier than you will want to hold, so I keep mine mounted on a tripod. Daylight shooting is best, always using a high shutter speed (1/1000 second is my default). Wildlife photography is where this lens really shines. Got good but not great pictures of the moon, but I'm sure with a little experimentation, that will work out. Will frame about 2/3 of the moon at highest power, but needs remote shutter release or using the camera's self-timer to prevent blurring, but haven't checked out this option yet.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Canon PIXMA MP280 Inkjet Photo All-In-One (4498B002)

Canon PIXMA MP280 Inkjet Photo All-In-One
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
Buy Now
I have used an Epson for several years, being loyal to the brand, but have grown intolerant of the printing quality. No matter how much I calibrated the printer, I still go blue streaks everywhere for normal printing. Very frustrating.

'

The PIXMA MP280 has satisfied that need. It comes with a bunch of bells and whistles, but I was looking for something I would use every day to print, scan and copy, something to replace my Epson printer and Epson scanner (two separate components). This fit that need very well.

The price would lead you to believe that its quality is not very good. However, unless you're a photographer or graphic artist who requires really high resolution output onto really good paper, this is a fine addition to the office.

With that said, here are some notes:

First, you need to supply your own USB printer cable for this device. The printer does not come with one. Personally, I find this to be a huge miss. No manufacturer should assume that any customer has all the tools for the job. It's the same cable I use for my Epson, so I'm fine. This is such an easy way to make it easier on the end user. Therefore, this is a big miss.

SETUP AND INSTALLATION: I'm on a Mac, so setup was complete and I was printing in under 30 minutes. The manual says you need at least 20 minutes for software installation, but mine was installed in less than 10.

OUTPUT: Color printing was satisfactory. Nothing that I could hang on a wall (but I don't need it.) At standard printing, the color output was insanely slow less than two pages per minute. If you use color printing at the "fast" selection, not much quality is sacrificed, and the printing came out to about four pages per minute. For black and white, the printing was again satisfactory, with about six pages per minute. As a note: In relation to the IPM, the problem with that measurement is that while we all print images, 99% of the time they are still on regular 8.5x11 paper. So the image could be nice, but the paper still has to come out. What I printed above were pdfs, and the color was SLOW.

COPYING: Very easy. One button for color or black and white with satisfactory output. The copier warming up takes longer than the copy itself a total of about 30 seconds.

SCANNING: Again, satisfactory. The DPI is not very high, but this is an everyday scanner. Most of the customers would be people who want to share images on Facebook.

COLOR CARTRIDGES: One of the things I hated about my old Epson was that I had to change out color cartridges about once every two months. I have run several dozen color prints through this and it's now telling me that I need a color refill. Ugh. So I'm not thrilled that I may face the same situation with this one.

Overall, three stars. This is a solid printer for everyday use, and I like the compact size with the all-in-one features. The lack of a USB printer cable and the fact that it doesn't do a very good job with color ink consumption keep me from giving this really high marks. But this has a place in a home where it will see a lot of output, perhaps in a home with school-age children or home office.

A good all-in-one, worth the money.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

ViewSonic PJD5123 SVGA DLP Projector 120Hz/3D Ready, 2700

ViewSonic PJD5123 SVGA DLP Projector  120Hz/3D Ready, 2700 Lumens, 3000:1 DCR
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
Buy Now
I've only had my ViewSonic PJD5123 one day, which is a little premature for reviewing, but with only one review posted, I thought another would be helpful. I actually made my purchase on that review's recommendation, since I could find no others.

First, let me say that my purchase was largely price-driven. I figured I'd have to buy a used projector, but the low price Amazon charged was the hook that caused me to bite on this brand-new one. My second criterion was that it had to work with a Mac; it does! I did have to purchase an extra cable for my Macbook Pro unibody ($29.99 from Apple). I could have gotten a third party cable for much less (and may still do that for a backup), but the reviews on them were not as favorable as those on the Apple one.

So I took the plunge, even paying an extra $4 (Amazon Prime) to have it delivered in two days. It arrived on time and I found everything in the box as advertised. The written documentation is worthless, but their CD has much good information. You can also go to the ViewSonic website and download their PDF manual to read before your purchase arrives (highly recommended).

I installed the software on my Macbook Pro, connected the ViewSonic PJD5123 and fired it up. My computer (running OS X 10.6.7) recognized the projector and the computer screen's image shone on the white wall across the room, but it was very blurry. My heart sank. Thinking I'd bought a pig in a poke, I began lamenting the irritation of having to ship it back. Then, I began to turn the adjustments this way and that, and the picture on the wall became as clear as the one on the laptop screen. Was I ever relieved!

Then I wondered, will it work in an environment with a lot of daylight? Because I teach college courses and give seminars in rooms with many windows, I needed a projector with enough brightness to provide a clear text and picture in broad daylight. Now please do not misunderstand. The picture and text are better at night, but they are just fine in the daylight.

Someone may wonder how it works for movie watching. I've been watching movies on my 17" computer screen, so when I focused the ViewSonic with a movie projecting from it on the wall, I held my breath hoping that it would provide at least an acceptable picture. Wow, was I every pleased! I now have a huge screen on the wall that looks as good as the one on my computer. This is a bonus I'd not planned on.

Another concern for me is the voltage. I travel internationally and was delighted to find that this little projector works with 110-240v/50-60hz. With a plug adapter I'll be in business in the USA and foreign countries.

I almost forgot to mention that while there is no carrying case, a remote (with batteries!) is included. I've barely used the remote, but the features look sufficient for my use. As for the bag, what do you want for a rock bottom price? I'll likely go to the local thrift store and find a suitable case for less than three bucks!

Do I have any concerns or disappointments? So far I'm not disappointed at all. This projector does all the basic stuff I need and provides a very nice picture. My only concern is that when I shut it down I do not hear the fan running to cool it down before final shut down as the instructions indicate. I will call or email the company to see if its shut down feature is defective. My guess is that it is just fine. Other than that, it seems to work A-OK!

Please note that this is not a heavy-duty, latest and greatest feature-filled projector. For such a product you'll likely pay three or four times what this little fellow costs. But it does what I need and even has an eye to the future with a sticker that boasts "3-D READY."

ADDED 6 JULY, 2011

Just a quick note on the issue of the fan not running after shutdown to cool the projector: I emailed ViewSonic on Saturday of the July 4th weekend and they responded promptly the following Tuesday after the holidays. Here's their email response:

"Dear Valued Customer,

Thank you for contacting ViewSonic. Our newer projectors have a feature in which the unit will cool off on its own when needed. This new feature is so that the unit can be used more on the go , ViewSonic and a few other brand name companies have added such feature to recently manufactured projectors . If you should have further questions please contact us back. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to provide assistance."

Well, I couldn't believe what I'd read, so I called ViewSonic and talked to a technical person. He assured me that the email was, indeed, correct and that the unit is working just fine. He said ViewSonic designed this projector so that one could immediately pack it away after using it. For me, this is a blessing in disguise! It means that I can use the projector until the close of class, and immediately walk out with it.

Summer 2012 Update: Just to let everyone know, I am still using the PJD5123 with satisfaction. Some have questioned whether it does, indeed, work with 240V as well as 110V. If you look on the bottom of the unit, it says AC 100-240V 50-60HZ.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Samsung Galaxy Indulge 4G Prepaid Android Phone (MetroPCS)

Samsung Galaxy Indulge 4G Prepaid Android Phone
Customer Ratings: 2.5 stars
Buy Now
Aside from the fact that I paid $400 for this phone, it sucked so bad. I cant say it any other way. It literally dies every 4 hours and whats the point of having a phone if you cant even use it? You might as well implant a usb port into your arm because you will be taking the recharge chord EVERY WHERE. I gave it a 2 instead of a 1 because I loved the double keyboard and screen is big. But thats where it ends. This phone is just plain useless, I would make 4 (5min) calls when I had this phone with perhaps 7 min of surfing and it still would die on me in less than 6 hours. I regret spending so much money on this piece of garbage phone. Not to mention the 4G on Metropcs is non existent 94% of the time.

I was with metro for 6 years and Im glad I moved to boost mobile. Not only was there internet faster and more reliable, I stuck with the tried and true blackberry and cant be any happier. Its a curve so it doesnt have touch screen, but if I had to sacrifice communication for 3 hrs of touch screen then CLEARLY its not worth it. Do not buy, you will be happy you didnt.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

ePhotoInc Carbon Fiber Steady Cam Rig DSLR Video Camera

ePhotoInc Carbon Fiber Steady Cam Rig DSLR Video Camera Stabilizer Vest Dual Arm Kit DualS120
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
List Price: $1,599.99
Sale Price: Price Unavailable
Today's Bonus: 53% Off
Buy Now

Incredibly complete steady rig. I was terrified I would receive a picture instead of the rig itself for no more than I paid for it. It's the real deal medium duty steady cam rig that sells for $1500 to $2000 under a different name. Other than putting it on backwards the first time because I'm that person, lol. Works perfect and adjust from nothing on the glider to 20lbs. of camera matte box filters & field monitor. Many thanks for saving a ton of $$.

OTVWX

Open Trail Video WorX

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Samsung Galaxy S4, Brown (Verizon Wireless)

Samsung Galaxy S4, Brown
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
Buy Now
This phone is amazing. Far better than any iPhone. Amazing display, fast responses, and cool gesture movements and voice commands. Would recommend this phone to anyone.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Samsung UN55C7000 55-Inch 1080p 240 Hz 3D LED HDTV (Black)

Samsung UN55C7000 55-Inch 1080p 240 Hz 3D LED HDTV
Customer Ratings: 4.5 stars
Buy Now
I am simple. Simple tastes. Simple pleasures. Simple needs. I will research a major purchase enough to know what will stick around for 5 to 10 years depending on how much technology changes, look at my budget, and fire away with the best purchase I can make.

That being said, my requirement was 1080p, 240Hz, 55" with a Blue Ray player. 3D didn't matter to me at the time, but when I saw the deal for this TV, which included 3D, the Blue Ray (with 3D) and the glasses and the (How to Train Your Dragon) movie for a cheaper price than what I was pricing just the TVs for in previous weeks, I snapped it up.

The results, pure and simple, are stunning. We watched Train Your Dragon with the 3D glasses and were quite frankly blown away.

Yes, in this day and age, everyone wants to be the expert of what they know and poo-poo anything that is not professional quality, not top-of-the-line whatever and will write extensively about it...and this is actually a good thing for sure. But to me, does the technology deliver? Absolutely! Was I blown to the back of my seat. Absolutely. Was the quality of the picture great? Absolutely. Will 99.98% of purchasers like this product? No. They will LOVE it. The rest can write 10,000 words about how and why spending the extra money will prove to be the better choice for exactly 6 weeks until the next more-awesome thing comes along to trump today's tech.

Simply stated...you want something that is great and will last for years? Come get it. It's here, it's cheap enough to say yes, and you will not regret the purchase if your life has more to do with just being entertained with what you have instead of always pondering what you could have.

There will always be Ferrari (and the like), but somehow I think the rest of us simply enjoy a really well built, reliable, affordable car with a good sound system that will last.

This is that purchase. Let the Porsche and Ferrari owners duke it out over track times and performance that most likely they will never experience from day-to-day anyway. And if you do like performance above all else...be prepared to pay for the experience that comes with it. This works plenty for my 1 to 2 hours viewing experience per day.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Canon PIXMA MX340 Wireless Office All-in-One Printer (4204B019)

Canon PIXMA MX340 Wireless Office All-in-One Printer
Customer Ratings: 3.5 stars
Buy Now
Got this printer couple of weeks ago and it has been performing up to my expectation. I still cannot believe the price of this AIO printer. Even at the MSRP of $99 from Canon, it is still very well below a comparable unit from other brands. I like a good bargain, so originally I had 2nd thought on getting this because it was only $10 cheaper at Amazon than list price. However, after comparing other AIO printers with similar features like wireless, fax, auto-document feeder, this became a no-brainer.

Pros:

AIO with fax.

Mac friendly software

Price point

Sleek symmetric design vs. other brands (i.e. all trays are closable to create a neat look)

Self opening output tray if tray is closed. I had other printers where if I forgot to open the output tray, the paper would just cumple up.

Easy Wi-Fi setup

reasonable replacement OEM ink cartridge prices.

iPhone/iPod touch app for printing photos from your iPhone or iPod touch.

USB cable included, useful and a must for initial setup

Cons:

so far I have not been able to fax from my MacBook wirelessly, though faxing from PC wirelessly works.

slow start-up like most other users have experienced

I have owned AIO printers from HP, Lexmark, and Epson before. This model by far has been the best price performance for me.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

ViewSonic ViewPad 7 7-Inch Android 2.2 Tablet - Black (Wifi

ViewSonic ViewPad 7 7-Inch Android 2.2 Tablet - Black
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
Buy Now
OK I received my VPad7 yesterday afternoon, and so far I'm MOSTLY Happy!

It's zippy, but I do wish they had put in a 1Ghz processor. Will probably force it out of a Honeycomb Upgrade.

I can not get Adobe Flash to install, but so far I haven't found that to be an issue on the web.

Viewing Angels not a problem, Battery life We'll see after it's conditioned but so far I'd estimate 4-8hrs depending on activities.

Tested Transformers 720p HD and not one flicker

Sound from it's little speakers Impressive!

Dropped my T-Mobile SIM in and BOOM instant Big Phone :D The Speed only shows Edge, but I'm in a funky location.

Phone quality Just got off a 1 hour conference call using both the speakerphone option and the plugin headset. No complaints from anyone. I heard the other end just fine.

Reception signal is actually BETTER with this than with my actual T-Mobile HD2 phone.

Highly Recommend getting a MicroUSB card as the internal memory is minimal. Get the more expensive FAST card for better performance.

Streaming music, sounds Great just as nice as an MP3.

GPS works like a champ!

Angry birds works great :D

My only other Gripe is the keyboard It functions fine, but I'd like to use the Market's Better Keyboard, which after installed and enabled doesn't swap out for the swype keyboard that is standard.

I may look into the "rooting" options that people have done with it's big brother, but so far it's handsomely accomplished everything I've tasked it with!

If you're looking for a Bigger Screen Smartphone, and don't want to pay that extra Data Fee that the carriers are forcing on us, this is CURRENTLY your best option! and with that extra Data Fee you can't use it's competitors (Galaxy Tab for example) as a phone, even though they have the capability.

If I have luck with rooting and installing any custom ROM, I'll post my results. It's not a top priority ATM as it's satisfactory as it is.

TO Viewsonic Get is certified for Flash, and unlock it so I can use whatever virtual keyboard I want and you'd get 5 stars!!

Update: 5/30 OK after using it awhile I've come up with two major flaws this may be MY actual device, or an actual design flaw 1) Charging has become a game I have to Cinch the Power cord behind the Tablet using something to Hold it in place back there then maneuver the USB plug just right or it won't charge. 2)the "Buzzer" now goes off if you hold the the Tablet too tight or if its in my computer bag; and won't stop until you slap it. So it now sits in a cradle, it functions fine and I still use it, but not outside of my home office.... I should have returned/exchanged it, but I had such problems getting basic information from Viewsonics' Customer Service, I just re purposed it and got the XOOM which I LOVE 110%. Hopefully no one else has had this issue, if not for that I'd Still give it 4 Stars.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Panasonic DMP-BDT320 Integrated Wi-Fi 3D Blu-ray DVD Player

Panasonic DMP-BDT320 Integrated Wi-Fi 3D Blu-ray DVD Player
Customer Ratings: 3.5 stars
List Price: $199.99
Sale Price: $114.97
Today's Bonus: 43% Off
Buy Now

**Upfront advice:

if you're looking for excellent disc playback and streaming performance, buy this player.

This is my fourth network streaming BD player in the past 15 months, and it's the only one that seems to do everything right.

**Positives:

Wireless streaming totally works on the BDT320. Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon have not given me any problems. No rebuffers, no freezes, no disconnections. This was my single biggest complaint about the other players I tried (two Samsungs and one LG).

The player's picture quality from discs is excellent, for either Blu Ray or DVD (the DVD picture is surprisingly good, actually).

This thing is fast -faster than the other three players I had. It's fast to load, and fast to navigate. The menus are clean, polished and responsive. Even the streaming app menu responds quickly, although the Netflix app itself is rather slow.

Build quality is quite good, and the design is very attractive and unique.

**Negatives:

There's really only one, and it's minor: the remote uses a touchpad that can be tricky. I applaud the concept, because it's a great way to control the player without having to look at the remote. And it does work...sort of. It's just too inconsistent, sometimes missing gestures, and other times responding incorrectly to gestures. Also, some of the player functions are accessible only through the touchpad using onscreen menus. This means that there's no way to teach these commands to a universal remote, so accessing them will require several button presses instead of one.

All in all, the remote hasn't been an issue. I use a Harmony One universal remote, and although the code set for the BDT320 isn't yet in the Harmony online database, by using the code set from last year's Panasonic BD players I was able to get most of the functionality of the BDT320's stock remote. As I noted above, some functions are menu driven, so the remote can't learn them, but on the upside, using last year's player codes gave me buttons not available on the BDT320 remote such as Eject and discrete On and Off.

**Unknown:

I have not attempted to play burned DVD media, and I don't do network (DLNA) or hard-drive streaming (such as for DiVX files) so I can't comment on any of this.

**Bottom line:

For user-friendly, high-quality playback of discs and streamed content, this player is a winner. As an early adopter, I paid $180.00, and I definitely believe I got my money's worth.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Sony SLT A99 hard bundle with A99 Grip and HVLF60M flash

Sony SLT A99 hard bundle with A99 Grip and HVLF60M flash
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
This camera is not for novices and neither is this review. Fasten your seatbelt!

The A99 is probably the most technologically sophisticated DSLR on the planet with the caveat that the video is less than stellar. While the camera's unique features for still shooting, when taken individually, may not sound like much, I've found that they are powerfully synergistic with each other and with the electronic viewfinder (EVF). The result for me is a capability for real-time decision-making and optimization of settings well beyond what I can do with any other camera, even the A77. While I doubt that any one person could make practical use of all of the A99's features, that's not my problem. There is a base set of features, some of which are brand new, that bring real magic and are improving my photography. For example, there's one new A99 exclusive that gives me unprecedented, real-time, simultaneous control of the shutter-speed, aperture, and ISO triad. I can quickly cause the flash to expose for the distance to any feature, anywhere in a scene. As with the A77, I can see an approximation of DRO as well as basic exposure before I shoot, eliminating trial and error.

Now for a dose of reality: The A99 is a full-frame (FF) camera, which means that it costs more, and its lenses are heavier, bigger, typically smaller in zoom range, and generally much more expensive than for APS-C. It has an important competitor in Sony's A77 with the same resolution in a smaller sensor some would say the A77 is the best of both worlds if you're not concerned with sensor noise. On video, I beat the A99 with a $400 Handycam. The decision to buy may require consideration of all of these things. I'm going to do my best to help you sort it all out.

So the decision to buy an A99 likely boils down to five considerations: purchase cost; lens options and lens investment; low-noise performance; size and weight; the benefits of the unique features; and your requirement for strong video performance. In this review, I'll begin by summarizing my own noise testing results and the significance of noise to the photographer. Next I'll run down features and associated benefits, beginning with feature-differences between A99 and A77 and then covering special features common to both. I'll tell you about the magical capabilities afforded by the unique features mentioned in the first paragraph. I'll also give you my personal take on the EVF versus optical viewfinder (OVF) question and make a few points on that subject that I haven't seen elsewhere. Please see the Comments section for an up-to-date, in-depth look at the video issue.

My noise-test images were done in RAW format, converted to TIFF in Sony software, and then examined in Photoshop. I formerly tested the A550 versus the A580 and found no significant differences in noise characteristics. Later I tested and ranked the A580, A850, and A77 for noise and compared results. Finally, I compared the A850 and A99. The (approximate) rankings are as follows: A77 was weakest; A550 and A580 were about 2/3 stop better than A77; A850 (in RAW only) was a full stop better than A77; and A99 was roughly a full stop better than A850 or two stops better than A77. How important is noise? A lower-noise camera can shoot at higher ISO. An A99 at ISO 6400 will perform roughly as well as an A77 at ISO 1600, for example. Lower noise means more than the ability to work in low light: it means you can shoot at higher f-number when you need depth of focus and at faster shutter speed (SS) when you need to minimize camera-shake blur (e.g., with long lenses or low SS), or freeze action. A lower-noise camera with a wider dynamic range (the A99 records 14 bits) has more to work with when converting raw data to jpeg; for example, you can impose stronger DRO levels to illuminate shadows without blowing out highlights. If you're post-processing from RAW yourself, you have more dynamic range in your RAW files, which gives you more options in how you manage contrast at the extremes. When cameras apply their own noise-reduction algorithms, the details can be softened, which is why I shoot RAW when possible. With low noise, you can get away with more sharpening (which is severely limited by the presence of noise). (Many cases of really ugly noise are the result of too much sharpening, which was THE flaw in the A859/900, an otherwise good low-light camera.) I've found that shooting RAW, I get excellent images at ISO 6400 with an A99. Shooting at ISO 3200, the noise differences in the A99 and A77 were easily apparent without pixel peeping. As I'll explain, multi-frame noise reduction (MFNR) can greatly increase the usable ISO (as much as 3 stops) in both the A77 and the A99. Noise is the biggest reason to choose an A99 over an A77. If this doesn't matter to you, the playing field may be tilted toward the A77, but please read on because I've yet to describe the new A99 magical features.

A77 advantages (besides body cost and smaller-lighter-cheaper, wider-zoom-range lenses):

1. Slightly smaller than the A99, mainly in width 7mm narrower. This difference pales in comparison to the size and weight penalties of the FF lenses required by the A99. The old Minolta lenses do offer some smaller-lighter-cheaper FF options.

2. 3 ounces lighter than the A99, but again this is nothing to the weight differences in lenses, particularly in zooms and longer telephotos. (Sony claims that the A99 is the world's lightest, interchangeable-lens, FF camera. They have to use the lens caveat because of the RX-1.)

3. 12 frames per second (fps) at full resolution compared to the A99's 10 fps at 10MP resolution or 6 fps at full. If you want to show a foot compressing a soccer ball during a kick, you need an A77 (in good light). For me, high fps numbers are only significant for bragging rights, but they may be essential for you.

4. Built-in flash

5. 6 % more shots from a battery than the A99. See later suggestions on how to conserve battery life in both cameras.

6. 3D recording

A99 advantages (besides lower noise):

1. Customizable button (located where the flash pop-up button is on A77)

2. Magical feature number 1: Flash exposure level (FEL) lock (p122 in the manual), assigned by default to the customizable button. This breakthrough function allows you recompose after telling the camera what scene feature to use to meter the flash. This eliminates a HUGE amount of trial and error in flash photography when your main subject is off-center and the flash tries to meter on a distant background, blowing out your foreground subject. It is also superior to ADI flash metering in most circumstances.

3. Magical feature number 2: "Silent Multi-controller"-a new third dial that you operate with the thumb of your left hand. I've found magic when I assign it to ISO. For example, if you go into Aperture Priority mode and twirl this dial, you can see your ISO changing and shutter speed (SS) compensating while the aperture holds fast and exposure stays constant. I'll say more about this powerful and VERY COOL feature, which is highly synergistic with the EVF. See, however, my wish list, which suggests how it could use one more assignment option.

4. Autofocus Range Control, another simple-to-use, breakthrough feature, which allows you to constrain focus to avoid foreground focus such as can occur on window glass, screens, link fences, and foliage.

5. Tethering to a computer via an app called Remote Camera Control. This allows you to control the camera from your computer and/or make shots to go directly into a folder on your computer (PC or Mac), but there is no WiFi on the camera. Search with Google for ways to tether directly to Lightroom.

6. Only the A99 (besides the discontinued A700) has a feature called Quick Navi, which allows you to look at your settings screen, hit the Fn button, and make changes from your settings screen view. Earlier models, including A77, have a screen that shows live-view with settings arrayed around the border with similar Fn-button access; the A99 retains this option as well.

7. Two card slots instead of one. Good, but you'll be changing batteries more often than cards. I like it because I don't have to keep up with a spare card in a camera bag.

8. Advanced autofocus robustness on a limited set of lenses that Sony will expand via firmware updates

9. Rapid and accurate autofocus during video with the same limited set of lenses that will be expanded

10. Vertical grip option that allows simultaneous loading of a total of three batteries instead of the usual two. The grip stayed sold out in the U.S. for months after the release of the (power hungry) A99. You're expanding your magazine from 500 to 1500 shots by going from one to three loaded batteries. See my suggestions on power conservation.

11. Higher resolution screen, 1,229 versus 921. A 30 percent increase, but will you really notice?

12. Headphone jack and XLR audio output as well as uncompressed HDMI out.

13. 1080p at 24 Hz as well as 60 Hz. This doesn't matter to me, but maybe it does to you.

14. Expensive video accessories designed exclusively for the A99. Based on my video tests, I don't think they'll be big sellers.

15. You can set the ISO higher 25,600 vs 16,000. Most reviews point this out as if it matters. This can matter in autoHDR mode; otherwise, I'm not so sure.

16. New iAuto mode that automatically invokes compositing when "needed." **Update: Friedman tells me this is the same as an A77 mode by a different name.** I generally stay away from this mode, which allows the camera to take over ALL the decision making. I don't like surprises when it comes to camera behavior.

17. The A99 has a new hotshoe that is compatible with industry standard flashes (e.g., Vivitar and SunPack) and still incorporates all the contacts necessary to support advanced proprietary flash functions. This is an advantage for some but a disadvantage for those with a heavy investment in Sony flashes. The A99 comes with a converter back to the Sony proprietary shoe, but that's one more thing to keep up with, and it makes your Sony flash less stabile, although it does better than I expected. The new HVL-F60M flash works with the A99 shoe and has a built-in, LED-based movie light. Otherwise it's very similar to the HVL-F58am. I like using the compact HVL-F20AM where I don't have a built-in flash and I need something small and convenient. The new shoe converter will make that little flash ride a little higher than I'd like, but it will put a bit more distance between flash and aperture with some benefit in red-eye reduction.

18. A choice of Max or Standard Power Save mode. The manual doesn't mention it, indicating it was a last-minute addition. I've concluded that Max mode is equivalent to setting the Power Saving Start Time to 10 seconds and having the rear LCD go to a dim mode at about 6 seconds. It lets you to go to the minimum Power Saving Start time with less hassle.

19. In-camera audio leveling

There are tons of features common to the A99 and A77, many of which are Sony exclusives. These are the ones that make me a better photographer:

1. Preview button if you set this to "Shot Result Preview," you not only get a preview of depth of field, but you preview DRO (only approximately) and lens compensation as well. It tries to show blurring effects of slow shutter speed, but don't bet the farm on that prediction. This is another of those features that couples with the Silent Multi-controller and EVF to make a killer combination.

2. fast-focusing live view as fast as any DSLR through its optical view finder and about 20X faster than Canon and Nikon's live view.

3. multi-frame noise reduction (MFNR), which, for stationary subjects, is the next best thing to a tripod (or my trusty beanbag). Of the three similar options (the other two are Handheld Twilight and Night Scene) on the cameras, MFNR is my favorite. It shoots 6 frames in rapid succession and then lines them up and merges them to average out noise and deliver one high-resolution, low-noise image in low-light. The downside is that the processing ties up the camera for a few seconds. (While this is limited to stationary subjects, you must remember that you can't generally shoot moving subjects with long exposures on tripods either.) The net benefit is up to three stops worth of noise reduction. I ignored this feature until I spent extensive time with the A77, and now I keep it as one of my three memory presets. A memory preset is necessary for me because I mostly shoot RAW plus jpeg, and I have to revert to pure jpeg to use this feature. The memory preset allows me to switch all needed setting changes instantly. When you switch out of a memory setting, the camera resets everything back to where it was before. See my memory settings and wish list for more on this feature.

4. auto high dynamic range (autoHDR), in which, for stationary subjects, the camera shoots three frames in succession at differing exposure levels. You can set the difference to be up to 6 stops total across the three frames. (I've found trial-and-error to be necessary, and I generally start with a 3-stop spread. Too much spread reduces contrast and washes out the image in many situations.) It then aligns and superimposes selected parts of the pictures, replacing dark areas in the middle exposure with corresponding areas from the higher exposure, and replacing "whited-out" areas in the middle exposure with corresponding areas from the lower exposure. AutoHDR does what DRO does without the noise penalty this has been huge for me on all my Sony cameras, and I've learned to keep it as another memory preset. For more info, see my memory settings and wish list.

5. tilt screen that allows you to hold your camera overhead, on the ground, next to a macro subject, looking around corners, or any way you might hold a periscope. Try putting your camera on a monopod with shutter timer set for 10 seconds. Now it's like a LONG periscope you can see over a 10-foot fence. (That's also how the pros get those pictures looking down on pre-game football huddles.) The combination of the EVF and the articulated screen also allows me to keep my screen folded up to save power and avoid using a screen protector with the attendant penalty in glare reflection. (Camera manufacturers go to great pains with hardened anti-reflective coatings on the screens, and we stick reflective material right on top of their coatings.) This is a very, very important and practical feature.

6. Panoramic mode don't overlook the vertical and horizontal options and setting options. Experiment with different zoom levels to help control how much you capture vertically and horizontally. I've used it for shooting tall buildings and shorelines, for example. It may sound more like sizzle than steak, but it turns out to be a staple for me.

7. 1080p 60 Hz AVCHD but the performance is mediocre.

8. No need to bother with mirror lockup (mirror is stationary)

9. Stabilization in the camera body, reducing lens size-weight-cost and making all Minolta AF lenses good options for FF use. If you're just breaking into FF, and you're on a budget, get the Maxxum AF 50mm F1.7, the Maxxum AF 35-70mm F4, and the Minolta AF 70-210 F4. These are top-flight and readily available on eBaY, but be sure the numbers match exactly because lesser, cheaper alternatives exist. Note that the zooms hold the f-number across the full zoom range. Also, be sure to set the AF micro-adjust for these lenses. There are other superlative AF Minolta lenses such as the macros and the very, very pricey 17-35mm F3.5G with the greenish optical coating (not the orange).

10. Built-in lens compensation but only with output to jpeg

11. Weather-sealed magnesium body, but currently the only weather-sealed lens that I'm aware of is the 16-50mm DT, a dynamite lens, but only for the A77.

I should also mention the stereo mic on the A99. My test results on the mic were evaluated by a pro who said it was superb, offering excellent stereo imaging and superb wind-noise suppression. It's a pity the video isn't of similar quality.

Comments on EVF:

Others have written tons on the pros and cons of EVFs. The trouble is that the Experts who write for online publications are not experts on the EVF. It's like a person who's ridden a tricycle his whole life spending a couple of hours trying to ride a bike and declaring the tricycle superior. (I'll get some negative comments and "not helpful" hits for that, but it felt good anyway.) Let's start with the typical complaints about EVFs.

1. Complaint: The finder view isn't as pretty as an OVF view. It doesn't look like what I see with the human eye. Answer: So what? The purpose of any viewfinder is to show you what you will get when you take a shot, not to look pretty. The EVF does a far better job of predicting how things will turn out than an optical viewfinder and a meter reading.

2. Complaint: The image I see is too contrasty. Shadows are blacked out. The images I produce look better in this regard than what I saw in the EVF, meaning that it failed to predict correctly. Answer: This can be true, primarily because the finder doesn't show the effect of DRO, which brings out shadow detail. Use the preview button set to "Shot Result Preview" to see what you'll get out of the shadows. It isn't a perfect match, but it's close enough. And don't forget that with an OVF you have no clue how any of that will turn out until you take the shot. Actually, I wish there were a way to predict the results of autoHDR, which is the ultimate cure for blacked-out shadows and blown-out highlights.

3. Complaint: The fixed mirror effectively takes away half a stop worth of lens aperture. Answer: True, but the A99 is a superb low-light performer even after losing that half stop.

4. Complaint: A planar glass surface in the optical path can only degrade performance. Answer: In the A77 and A99, the resultant "ghosting" is too little to matter due to the improved anti-reflective optical coatings on the mirrors.

5. Complaint: When I use automatic review, my EVF is interrupted, blocking my vision. Answer: True. Turn off auto review and just tap the review button when you want to see results.

6. Complaint: I can't predict the effects of flash with an EVF. Answer: You can't with an OVF either. With the A99's FEL lock, you can make flash exposure far more predictable than with any other camera.

7. Complaint: I like to shoot flash with the camera in Manual mode. The EVF is too dark when I do that. Answer: Menu > Gear > 3 > Live View Display = Setting Effect Off. This will let you see through the EVF with any exposure setting. You can then hit the preview button if you want a (non-flash) preview. I've found that with low-f-number lenses, I can see better in the dark with an A99 than with an optical finder.

8. Complaint: Images are noisier as seen in the EVF before the shot than they turn out to be. Answer: This can be true in low light, even though the EVF uses the same main sensor that makes the image. The reason is that the exposure time must be shorter in the EVF in order to minimize image shudder, jitter, or "judder" when the camera is panned. When exposure time is shorter, noise is higher because amplification (equivalent to looking with higher ISO) must compensate. Bottom line: if you see noise in the EVF, you can expect the actual shot to be less noisy. Last time I checked, OVFs aren't particularly good at predicting noise either.

9. Complaint: I've heard about image shudder that you get when you pan an EVF. Answer: It is most significant in low light. It hasn't been enough to interfere with utility on either the A77 or the A99, but, theoretically, the A99 should have an advantage here. I'll admit that it can be annoying, especially if you're in a bad mood anyway (like some reviewers whose old paradigm is threatened).

10. Complaint: I can't see anything through the EVF when the camera's turned off. Answer: True, and silly as it is, it can be an annoyance. I suggest that you normally don't need to see through the finder if you don't want to take a picture. (I also have a problem seeing through DSLR OVFs with the lens cap on.)

11. Complaint: What's the big deal? Cameras with live view can do this with the rear screen! Answer: Even in ideal light, the screen is not as good as the EVF, either for predicting the results of shots or for reviewing results. To me, the EVF is roughly like having a 5x7 print to look at. When I get on my computer, I don't find the surprises that I used to.

Before I had the A77, I was hoping Sony would make their next FF camera with an OVF, adding all the in-camera processing features that the A900 and A850 lacked. I didn't trust the idea of an EVF, and I didn't like losing a half-stop worth of lens aperture to the fixed mirror. I was very disappointed when I heard Sony was dropping OVFs. After spending two intense weeks in the Eastern Mediterranean with the A77 in my hands for many hours a day, I changed my mind. Once I learned to take advantage of the EVF, I could set up optimized shots much faster with it. But it was when I had to do without the EVF that I really "got it." I sold my A77 a few weeks before I got my A99. During that time without an EVF, I would go out with my A850, and, in the presence of heavy glare, be unable to tell how my shots were coming out. That single, obvious advantage of the EVF outweighed everything else for me during that transitional time. The EVF is a better way to review results than a rear display in any light. (And boy is that true if you need reading glasses!) In glare situations, it's the only way. As I continue to develop my dexterity in control of aperture, SS, and ISO (using the A99's Silent Multi-controller in conjunction with the usual front and back control dials set as I describe below), I become more wedded to the EVF because I can control so many things simultaneously and see the effects on my exposure in real time. The preview button is also infinitely more powerful with an EVF. This is some of the ultimate synergy that I've been talking about.

The EVF shows exposure level (brightness); white balance; Creative Styles (an example is Sepia Image Style); and Picture Effects (Photoshop-like effects out of the camera). The preview button adds depth of field, DRO, and lens correction, and attempts to predict slow-SS blur. You can figure all these effects out to some extent without the EVF by taking shots and looking at them on a rear display. The EVF eliminates trial and error and gives you a better look, both before and after the shot, with the additional advantage that your eye never has to leave the finder. Sony even makes the rear display more effective with instant-focus live view and the articulated screen.

Here's my parting shot on the EVF. Long ago, people used rangefinder-type VFs. When the DSLR came along, it was hailed as a breakthrough because you could see through the actual lens. With the EVF as implemented with fixed mirror, you not only see through the actual lens, you see through the actual sensor too. It's another big step forward. A lot of people didn't think real photographers needed a pentaprism when they first came out. If you've got all day, get out a Leica M3, tripod, and light meter. You'll get fantastic results. If you've got 15 seconds to get the right exposure, get an A99.

Now I want to tell you about my personal favorite settings. These are the choices that give me that super synergy of features:

1. Front dial to exposure compensation (Menu > Gear5)

2. Silent controller to ISO (hold down center button can change quickly)

3. Preview button to Shot Result Preview (Menu > Gear4)

4. ISO button to DRO (Menu > Gear4)

5. Quality to RAW + jpeg (Menu > Camera1)

6. Mode to any PASM, but especially A

Memory Setting 1:

1. DRO/HDR to autoHDR 3EV (Fn button > right side)

2. Program Mode (when it's invoked with a memory setting, you can't come out of this without losing other settings, so you may want to go with A, S, or M)

3. ISO Auto (can always change it instantly with the Silent Multi-controller)

4. Quality to Extra Fine (Menu > Camera1) (can't use RAW here)

Memory Setting 2:

1. ISO to Multi-frame Noise Reduction (MFNR) Auto (ISO button or Fn button)

2. Aperture Priority

3. Aperture at F/2.8 (This is wide open for my walk around zoom, and I can always change it quickly with the rear control dial)

4. Quality to Extra Fine (Menu > Camera1) (can't use RAW here)

Memory Setting 3:

Gary Friedman's recommended settings for tripod shots (I must respect Gary's copyright on these)

The first combination of settings with either Aperture Priority or Shutter Priority can give you instantaneous control that is more complete than what you get with ordinary manual control and do it without the manual control awkwardness of having to maintain exposure by watching a meter. The next list tells how it all shakes out.

Program Mode

Front Dial (D1) = exposure compensation

Rear Dial (D2) = program shift; cycles aperture-SS combinations

Silent Multi-controller (D3) = ISO

Aperture Priority

D1 = exposure compensation

D2 = aperture

D3 = cycles through ISO-SS combinations

Shutter Priority

D1 = exposure compensation

D2 = SS

D3 = cycles through ISO-aperture combinations

Manual

D1 = SS

D2 = aperture

D3 = ISO

Note that Program Mode effectively becomes ISO-priority mode! We have perfect symmetry across PAS for the exposure triad. For each of these options, look what you have with D3 removed. That's what you have with all other cameras except the A99.

Consider aperture priority as an example. Your right thumb (rear dial) controls aperture. Your left thumb (Silent Multi-controller) controls shutter speed (SS) because when you change ISO, SS compensates to maintain the exposure level. You can run up and down the range of SS settings without ever changing exposure, which gives all the benefit of two-dial manual control without the hassle. Want the image a little brighter or darker? Use your right forefinger (front dial) for exposure compensation and you see in the EVF exactly how your exposure will turn out. If the image is too contrasty, blacking out the shadows, press the Preview Button. If the shadows are still too dark (or the contrast is too weak), tap the ISO button with your finger and adjust the DRO. You can swap the roles of aperture and SS by switching to Shutter Priority. Are you getting this? Don't glaze over on me: this is VERY, VERY powerful stuff, and the biggest difference maker is that ability to trade ISO with SS with your left thumb via the Silent Multi-controller. That's what turns Aperture Priority and Shutter Priority into total simultaneous control of aperture, SS, ISO, and exposure. You're doing all this with the EVF providing full, on-the-fly awareness of how your product will look an exposure meter isn't precisely accurate unless it's metering on something that's 18% gray. Want to know how you're doing in the shadows with DRO? Use the preview button with your left forefinger. Want to change it? Tap the reprogrammed ISO button.

Now, I'll grant you that this takes a little getting used to, but if you're experienced at all, it'll come quickly. What takes the time is discovering what I've just told you. That's what I meant by graduating from a tricycle to a bicycle. These well-meaning Experts who spend a few hours with an A99 aren't likely to figure this out, and, if they're arrogantly closed minded, they never will. This is a paradigm shift, and people invested in one way of doing things can easily overlook opportunity for a major improvement. I only figured it out because I forced myself to work with the new equipment. Canon and Nikon WILL copy the third-dial idea, but without EVF, it won't be as powerful. Remember, you heard it here first.

Next I want to offer suggestions on battery conservation. These are similar to Gary Friedman's suggestions, but I didn't plagiarize them, so here they are:

1. The rear display uses less power than the EVF, but it can tend to stay on much more. Keep the rear display turned around and closed against the camera, which turns off all power to it. You can flick it down when you need it. Keeping it closed allows me to avoid using screen protectors as I said earlier. I also don't get skin oil on it with my face. Note that if the screen isn't closed flush with the body, the EVF won't come on automatically. This is because if you flipped the screen all the way up, it would trigger the EVF.

2. Set Menu > gear 1 > Eye-Start AF to off so the autofocus doesn't churn around if you don't need it to continually focus (especially when it bounces against your body).

3. Set Menu > gear 1 > FINDER/LCD Setting to auto.

4. If you don't need it, set Menu > GPS Settings > GPS On/Off to Off.

5. Keep Smile Shutter off (Fn menu)

6. Keep Face Tracking off (Fn menu)

7. Set Menu > wrench >Power Save to Max if you can live with it that way. It goes to power save in just 10 seconds unless you have a menu open, in which case it stays on for a full minute, even if you don't touch anything. Note that you can wake the camera up by touching the Menu button as well as the shutter button.

The A99 and A77 use an infrared sensor at the eyepiece to tell when to switch on the EVF, which consumes significant power. If you have the camera over your arm or around your neck, clothing contact with the eyepiece may keep the EVF on indefinitely, which will rapidly discharge your battery. I find that a heavy lens will tip the camera far enough away from my body to usually leave the EVF off. Even so, when Power Save kicks in, the camera's consumption of power drops to zip, and you can wake it up with a a touch of the shutter or the Menu button. The shutter touch brings it back to the same exact state in which it powered down (unless it was on a menu). Friedman reported that he more than doubled the number of single-battery shots on an A77 using essentially these same settings. He used fill flash on some of his shots too. (It's troublesome to think that the A99 has 6% less magazine with no flash.)

Wish List (my message to Sony):

1. Give us a lossless format option for compositing, DRO, lens correction, etc. (Sony, I'm going to keep hitting you with this in these reviews until you give in. If it takes more processing power, add it; we'll pay for it.)

2. Combine MFNR and autoHDR. AutoHDR can lead to some slow shutter speeds. Help us here!

3. Allow customization of exposure comp button (e.g., flash exposure comp). How can you offer the option of setting a control dial for exposure comp and NOT let us reassign the exposure comp button??? What are you thinking???

4. Display ISO on top LCD display.

5. Display ISO while in autoISO mode through EVF without pressing shutter.

6. Allow DRO assignment to Silent Controller.

7. Is it just me, or is it hellish to use the joystick on the menu if you're in a hurry? I have trouble pushing the button down without tilting it. Please put it back like it was on the A900.

8. On a related subject, how about a touch screen to really make Quick Navi sing? You're behind the competition on that.

9. Most of all, I want Sony to fix the video. I don't have to tell them: the blogs are doing that all over the web. I hope Sony isn't run by the kinds of corporate execs who refuse to admit mistakes and face reality. If their handling of the noise problems in the A900 is any indication, they just may be. The video isn't bad; it just isn't good. The video problems for me don't overwhelm or underwhelm; they just whelm. We expect better.

If you've stayed with me this far, you must be deadly serious about this camera. I wish you luck in your decision. Be sure to peruse the comments section for other perspectives.

Tim

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Denon AVR-X1000 5.1-Channel Networking Home Theater AV Receiver

Denon AVR-X1000 5.1-Channel Networking Home Theater AV Receiver with AirPlay
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
List Price: $499.99
Sale Price: $449.00
Today's Bonus: 10% Off
Buy Now

The Denon AVR-X1000 is the successor to last year's 4-1/2 star rated Denon AVR-1713. Most features are the same as the AVR-1713. Like the AVR-1713, the AVR-X1000 is a 5.1-channel surround sound receiver that accepts a total of six input sources, plus TV audio as a seventh input source.

Over the past few years Denon has been gradually improving the look of their receivers. The AVR-X1000 has the look of a very high-end receiver, comparable to Marantz and Pioneer Elite receivers, yet it sells at a mid-range price. The photos above don't quite do it justice.

What's new?

* The AVR-X1000 has a longer warranty (3 years) than the AVR-1713 (2 years).

* The speaker connections on the back of the AVR-X1000 are color coded for easier setup. Last year's model did not have color-coded speaker connections.

* The AVR-X1000 supports both AM and FM radio. Last year's AVR-1713 only supported FM radio.

* Both models support Apple Airplay, Internet radio, Sirius XM, and Pandora, but the AVR-X1000 adds support for Spotify, too.

* Both models support MP3, WMA, AAC, and FLAC audio formats. The AVR-X1000 adds support for the Apple Lossless Audio Codec (ALAC) as well.

* The AVR-1713 used up and down buttons to select the input source. The AVR-X1000 uses a more attractive dial on the left-hand side.

* The AVR-X1000 has updated setup software.

* Denon's list price for the AVR-X1000 ($499) is $50 higher than last year's AVR-1713 ($449).

Comparison with the step-up Denon AVR-X2000:

* The AVR-X1000 supports 5.1 audio, while the step-up AVR-X2000 supports 7.1 audio.

* The AVR-X1000 has 80 watts per channel, while the AVR-X2000 has 95 watts per channel.

* The AVR-X1000 does not support Ultra HD (4K) upscaling, but the AVR-X2000 does.

* The AVR-X2000 has more HDMI and analog audio input jacks than the AVR-X1000. They have the same number of digital audio input jacks.

* The AVR-X2000 supports one component video input, while the AVR-X1000 does not.

Comparison with the step-down Denon AVR-E300:

* Both models support 5.1 audio.

* The AVR-X1000 has 80 watts per channel, while the AVR-E300 has 75 watts per channel.

* The AVR-X1000 has a 3-year warranty, while the AVR-E300 has a 2-year warranty.

* The AVR-X1000 supports a zone 2 line out, while the AVR-E300 does not.

* The AVR-X1000 supports the high-resolution Audyssey MultEQ XT room correction software with 6-8 measurement positions, while AVR-E300 only supports the medium-resolution Audyssey MultEQ. Both models support Audyssey Dynamic Volume and Audyssey Dynamic EQ.

* The AVR-X1000 has better-quality speaker connections. The AVR-E300 has new "Easy Connect Speaker Terminals" which work best with bare speaker wire and seem aimed at novices.

I have two complaints about the AVR-X1000. First, it doesn't support Wi-Fi. The network connection requires Ethernet. For Wi-Fi, CNET likes the Onkyo TX-NR626. Second, it is stingy with its digital audio inputs. The AVR-X1000 has only one coaxial and one optical digital audio input. By comparison, the competing Yamaha RX-V475 and Yamaha RX-V575 each have two coaxial and two optical digital audio input jacks (but fewer total device inputs). Aesthetically, however, Onkyo and Yamaha receivers have a utilitarian look that can't compete with this year's Denon line.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Light and Motion Sola Photo with Red Focus Light (1200-Lumens

Light and Motion Sola Photo with Red Focus Light
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
It is a very handy, powerful and sophisticated light.

I have it only 2 months and it has been underwater 3 times to date.

Also the service I received from "Light and Motion" support, as I had some queries related to its operation, it was superb and prompt.

Recommendation. Please study very carefully the small manual as it is very informative as regards its operation.

Particular attendance is to setting the "travelling " and "SOS" modes and how to return to the normal operating mode.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Rokinon 650-1300mm f/8-16 Telephoto Zoom Lens with 2x

Rokinon 650-1300mm f/8-16 Telephoto Zoom Lens with 2x Teleconverter + Monopod Kit for Nikon D3100, D3200, D5000, D5100, D7000, D700, D800, D4 Digital SLR Cameras
Customer Ratings: 4 stars
Buy Now
This is my second review on this product. Initially I wrote what will apear at the bottom of this review in quotes, however after contacting Clemeta Camera they were really good with the replacement process. They took the time to test my replacement lens before shipping and now have the 650-1300 lens that does what it's supposed to without any problems focusing. Really sharp crisp photos and focus ring on the replacement works fine now. Lens is still a little heavy, and tripod is recommended. If you have problems with the initial lens sent to you, recommend you immediately contact the seller for replacement and have them test it prior to shipment. Clemeta Camera did this for me and I'm happy with the lens. Here is my first review "Just received the telephoto today. So far disappointed as the threads for the t-adapter have extra coating thus making it hard to screw on. Focus ring takes both hands to turn. Feels like manual steering on an old 65 Mustang. Unless it loosens up a bit, I'll be looking for a refund."

I first rated this product with two stars but now give it a 4 as it's exactly what I was looking for and although the focusing is by hand, you can get crisp pictures if you take your time and practice.

Thanks Clemeta Camera for replacing the first lens.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>

Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC HSM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras

Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC HSM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras With Cleaning Kit, Flash Bracket, Micro Fiber Cleaning Cloth, Card Wallet, Zeikos Filter!, Lens Cap Cleaner and more!
Customer Ratings: 5 stars
Buy Now
This lens from Beach Camera was much cheaper than the Canon 28mm lens i was considering. Before i was using the canon 50mm lens with f1.8 and the standard zoom lens which at best was F4. The 50mm did a great job, i was able to take christmas pictures indoors with no flash and only using the regular house light. The pictures turned out spectacular and i was able to use the narrow depth of field to take some artsy photos. But, at 50mm on my t3i meant that i was zoomed in, and couldn't always get far enough away to take a good shot. I was really hurting for a 28-30mm lens.

When i bought the sigma, i thought F1.8 was already low enough, i wasn't enthusiastic about the extra 1.6 and 1.4 stop, it was just an added bonus. However after playing around with the lens, that extra .4 stop makes a world of difference in low light. For instance, i like to keep my shutter speed at least 1/40th of a second at a minimum. I also like to keep the iso as low as possible if i can to minimize noise. With the 1.8 50mm lens the same photo indoors would make my iso 1600 or 3200, the same photo taken at 1.4 dropped it down to 800iso, what a world of difference in terms of noise.

Of course, i bought this lens so i could be a reasonable distance from my subjects. This lens is as close to 1x normal human vision as possible. So what you see is what you'll get. The clarity is also great from the looks of my pictures, although i haven't done any scientific tests with it.

The only negative i have is you have to change the diopeter adjustment when switching between my other canon and the sigma lenses. Not a huge deal if you're just taking personal photos, but if you have a job where switching lenses is quite frequent, then it may be an issue.

Summary, if you want a lens for great narrow depth of field shots, low light photography, and a standard 1x prime for a majority of your shooting, this is it.

Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>